Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 147 N.W.2d 100.

58 citing documents.

Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370, (holding that appealable order is final after time for appeal has expired).
Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 498 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 498 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 368-69 , : “[I]t has been the rule of this court * * * that an order denying a motion to quash service of summons is appealable.” Hunt , 285 Minn, at 88, d at 300 (emphasis in original deleted).
Hand v. Kuutti 423 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hand v. Kuutti 423 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Cf. Dieseth v. Calder Manufacturing Co., 275 Minn. 365, 367-71 , -03 (1966) (failure to appeal prior final order in timely manner barred relitigation of same issue in second action).
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank 172 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1969
Followed Hunt v. Nevada State Bank 172 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1969
Co. 275 Minn. 365, 368 , 147 N. W. (2d) 100, 102 , we said: “While the rule we follow with respect to the appealability of an order quashing service of a summons may be the minority view [see, Annotation, 30 A. L. R. (2d) 287], it has been the rule of this court since Plano Mfg.