Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ahlm v. Rooney, 143 N.W.2d 65.

53 citing documents.

A & J BUILDERS INC. v. Harms 179 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1970
e for trial.” Giving plaintiff the full benefit of the rules that, in summary judgment proceedings, the moving party has the burden of proof *133 and the nonmoving party has the benefit of having the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to him; and that the motion for summary judgment should be denied if, under the evidence, reasonable men might reach different conclusions (Ahlm v. Rooney, 274 Minn. 259 , 143 N. W. [2d] 65; Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co. 270 Minn. 525 , 134 N. W. [2d]
Rosvall v. Provost 155 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 1968
Rosvall v. Provost 155 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 1968
See, Ahlm v. Rooney, 274 Minn. 259 , 143 N. W. (2d) 65 .