Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Albers v. Fitschen, 143 N.W.2d 841.

24 citing documents.

Keith D Hagfors, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Sara E Hagfors, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Generally, a statute of limitations provides an affirmative defense that is waivable by defendants.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Joseph Rued v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. 2024
Joseph Rued v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. 2024
Statutory requirements like the 30-day time limit at issue here are “more in the nature of a statute of limitations” and “create[] a defense which might be waived by a defendant who fails to assert it.” (“[A] statute-of-limitations defense is a claim-processing rule, which is subject to waiver.”).
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375, 377
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
See generally Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375, 377 , (applying the doctrine of waiver to a statute of limitations); Knipple v. Lipke, 211 Minn. 238, 239 , 300 N.W.
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Generally, statutes of limitations, like any affirmative defense, may be “waived by a defendant who fails to assert it.” Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375, 377 , see also Rehberger v. Project Plumbing Co., 295 Minn. 577, 578 , (per curiam).
Rediske v. Johnson 415 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rediske v. Johnson 415 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375, 376 , (citing Minn.Stat.
Christenson v. Argonaut Insurance Companies 380 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Christenson v. Argonaut Insurance Companies 380 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rehberger v. Project Plumbing Co., Inc., 295 Minn. 577 , Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375
Ike v. Anderson 369 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ike v. Anderson 369 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Relocation Realty Services Corp. v. Carlson Companies, Inc., Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375, 376-77
R.M. Parranto Co. v. Bernick 354 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
R.M. Parranto Co. v. Bernick 354 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375, 377
Relocation Realty Services Corp. v. Carlson Companies 264 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1978
Relocation Realty Services Corp. v. Carlson Companies 264 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1978
In Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375 , we construed Minn.St.
State ex rel. Spannaus v. Beslanowitch 248 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1976
Nodland v. Chirpich 240 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1976
Nodland v. Chirpich 240 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1976
Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375
Paske v. Liberty Equities Corp. 167 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1969
Paske v. Liberty Equities Corp. 167 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1969
3 In Albers v. Fitschen, 274 Minn. 375 , 143 N. W. (2d) 841 , we observed that c. 82 was enacted to prevent abuses by unqualified or unreliable real estate brokers.