State ex rel. Riggers v. Tahash
Cited by
- Marriage of Gully v. Gully 599 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1999
- Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Crown Coco, Inc. v. Red Fox Restaurant of Royalton, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Brunsoman v. Lexington-Silverwood 385 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Proprietors Insurance Co. v. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis 374 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Graham Investment Co. v. Grouse 369 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Melby v. Commissioner of Public Safety 367 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1985
- Gand v. Jay Bros., Inc. 367 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Liedtke v. Cloquet Service Center, Inc. 367 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Transamerican Insurance Co. v. Austin Farm Center, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Dufrane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska 331 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1983
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Roy v. Tahash 277 Minn. 238
- State ex rel. Cable v. Tahash 277 Minn. 503
Opinion text
Per Curiam. This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Washington County denying appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing. Applying the rules established in State ex rel. Roy v. Tahash, 277 Minn. 238 , 152 N. W. (2d) 301 , the petition appears to sufficiently allege some facts which, if proved, would entitle petitioner to relief, thus precluding a summary disposition. The decision of the trial court must, therefore, be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with our supervening postconviction-remedy statute, Minn. St. 590.01, et seq., (L. 1967, c. 336). See, State ex rel. Cable v. Tahash, 277 Minn. 503 , 152 N. W. (2d) 308 . Reversed and remanded.