40,964 Precedential Affirmed Processed

State v. Rosen

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed April 5, 1968 · 158 N.W.2d 202

Cited by

Explained in 1

State of Minnesota v. Sharon Ann Schmalzriedt Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Karl Evald Auleciems Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Herald Edward Liu v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Roy Biggs Henline Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Jo Huntington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Albert Schally Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Phillip Wayne Stewart, II Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Nadia Martynyuk Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Deshawn Nairfe Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Flicek 657 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Darris 648 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2002
State v. Kramer 441 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1989

all 22 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Sandve 279 Minn. 229

Opinion text

Per Curiam. Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crime of attempted indecent assault. The only legal question raised is whether it was error for the trial court to allude in its charge to the jury to the fact that the defendant failed to testify in his own behalf. State v. Sandve, 279 Minn. 229 , 156 N. W. (2d) 230 , filed February 9, 1967, since this appeal was taken, dictates affirmance. The instruction that the failure of the defendant to testify does not create a presumption against him in a criminal prosecution should not have been given, particularly in the absence of any request for such an instruction by the attorney for defendant. But we are certain that the verdict of *551 the jury was not affected by this comment in light of the evidence as disclosed by the record. Affirmed.