Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. WT Rawleigh Company, 144 N.W.2d 555.

57 citing documents.

Parness v. Economics Laboratory, Inc. 170 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1969
See, Peterson v. W. T. Rawleigh Co. 274 Minn. 495 , 144 N. W. (2d) 555 .
Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1969
Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1969
Peterson v. W. T. Rawleigh Co. 274 Minn. 495 , 144 N. W. (2d) 555 ; Jepson v. Country Club Market, Inc. 279 Minn. 28 , 155 N. W. (2d) 279 .
Sulack v. Charles T. Miller Hospital 165 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1969
Sulack v. Charles T. Miller Hospital 165 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1969
The challenged instruction is an imprecise adaptation of the principle stated in Restatement, Torts (2d) § 343 A, and the comment to that section, adopted for similar facts in Peterson v. W. T. Rawleigh Co. 274 Minn. 495, 497 , 144 N. W. (2d) 555, 557 , as follows: “A possessor of land is not liable to his invitees for physical harm caused to them by any activity or condition on the land whose danger is known or obvious to them, unless the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowle
Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation 153 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1967
Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation 153 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1967
In Peterson v. W. T. Rawleigh Co. 274 Minn. 495 , 144 N. W. (2d) 555 , this court held that the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent as a matter of law in walking over an obvious stretch of dangerous ice for a business purpose (to get order blanks and a load of products to sell).