DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Colgan v. Raymond, 146 N.W.2d 530.

31 citing documents.

  • Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    See, e.g., Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc., 276 Minn. 67, 71 , Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219, 226 , Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc., 238 Minn. 322, 329-30
  • Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , (“golden rule” argument, that jurors might place themselves in the position of the plaintiff and award such damages as they would wish if they were in same position, is disapproved of and, in some cases, reversible error).
  • Omlid v. Lee 391 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Omlid v. Lee 391 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219, 225
  • Davis v. Liesenfeld 240 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1976
  • Davis v. Liesenfeld 240 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1976
    While we have in the past condemned the use of such a jury argument, Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , we agree with the trial judge that, if read in context, the ambiguous remarks made by plaintiff’s counsel in this case do not constitute a resort to this disfavored argument.
  • Schwartz v. CONSOL. FREIGHTWAYS CORP. OF DEL. 237 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1975
  • Schwartz v. CONSOL. FREIGHTWAYS CORP. OF DEL. 237 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1975
    As to the importance of these matters in determining prejudice, see Kramer v. Kramer, supra; Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , Ellwein v. Holmes, 243 Minn. 397
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
    5 See, e. g., Marcum v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. 225 Minn. 139 , (references to permanence of injury when there was no evidence to support claim of permanence); Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , (“golden rule” argument on damages); Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , (appeals to sympathy).
  • Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
  • Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
    See, e. g., Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc. 238 Minn. 322 , Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc. 276 Minn. 67
  • Caspersen v. Webber 213 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1973
  • Caspersen v. Webber 213 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1973
    Zaikaner v. Small, 256 Minn. 275 , Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219
  • DelMedico v. Coats 203 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1973
  • DelMedico v. Coats 203 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1973
    Koehler v. Kline, 290 Minn. 485, 487 , Colgan v. Kaymond, 275 Minn. 219, 225 , Zaikaner v. Small, 256 Minn. 275, 282
  • Northwestern State Bank, Osseo v. Foss 197 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1972
  • Northwestern State Bank, Osseo v. Foss 197 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1972
    Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. *177 219
  • Burgstahler Ex Rel. Burgstahler v. Fox 186 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1971
  • Burgstahler Ex Rel. Burgstahler v. Fox 186 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1971
    Defendant contends that plaintiff’s counsel improperly indulged in the so-called “golden rule” argument, Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , 146 N. W. (2d) 530 , when he made the following statement to the jury: “I am going to leave that up to you, members of the jury.
  • Koehler v. Kline 185 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1971
  • Koehler v. Kline 185 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1971
    We must be controlled by the views expressed in Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , 146 N. W. (2d) 530 , and numerous authorities referred to therein, that large verdicts should be closely scrutinized where the damages are based upon subjective symptoms only, but that, in the final analysis, the issue of whether damages are excessive rests largely in the discretion of the trial court, whose action
  • Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
  • Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
    Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , 146 N. W. (2d) 530 .
  • Knoll v. Nussbaum 162 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1968
  • Knoll v. Nussbaum 162 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1968
    Although there, was competent medical evidence introduced by defendant in support of his claim that there was no permanent damage to plaintiffs resulting from the accident, we believe that affirmance is indicated by such decisions of this court as Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727 , and Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , 146 N. W. (2d) 530 .
  • Lamont v. INDEPENDENT SCH. D. NO. 395 OF WATERVILLE 154 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1967
  • Lamont v. INDEPENDENT SCH. D. NO. 395 OF WATERVILLE 154 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1967
    Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219, 225 , 146 N. W. (2d) 530, 534 ; Morrison v. Carpenter, 179 Mich.
  • Walser v. Vinge 146 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966