Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Ahern v. Young, 141 N.W.2d 15.

32 citing documents.

State v. Willis 898 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2017
State v. Willis 898 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2017
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240 , (recognizing that a sentencing order required a defendant to pay restitution), In 1977, however, a defendant did not have a statutory right to a hearing to resolve factual disputes regarding the proper amount ór type of restitution.
State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan Willis 883 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan Willis 883 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240, 241, (listing restitution as a condition of probation imposed 5 following a forgery conviction); see also Minn. Stat. § 609.135 (1976) (stating that a court may stay execution of sentence and place an individual on probation “on such terms as
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240, 243 , ).
State v. Weaver 796 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Weaver 796 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240, 243
State v. Hanson 572 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1997
State v. Hanson 572 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1997
Ahem v. Young, 273 Minn. 240,243 , (“determination of what conduct constitutes a criminal offense and the punishment that ought to be imposed * * * is peculiarly a legislative and not a judicial function”); State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 293 , ).
State v. Sutherlin 341 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
State v. Sutherlin 341 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240
State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240 , prison time served under an invalid executed sentence should be credited.
State v. Wilwert 317 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1982
State v. Wilwert 317 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1982
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240
State v. Randolph 316 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1982
State v. Randolph 316 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1982
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240
State v. Jonason 292 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1980
State v. Jonason 292 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1980
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240 , State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286
Vezina v. State 289 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1979
Vezina v. State 289 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1979
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240
State v. Osterloh 275 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1978
State v. Osterloh 275 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1978
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240, 243 , this court said: “Determination of what conduct constitutes a criminal offense and the punishment that ought to be imposed (including the terms and conditions of probation, confinement, and parole) is peculiarly a legislative and not a judicial function.” Accord, State v. Meyer, 228 Mi
State v. Loveland 240 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1976
State v. Loveland 240 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1976
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240 , is controlling.
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company 197 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1972
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company 197 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1972
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240
State Ex Rel. Sargent v. Tahash 160 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1968
State Ex Rel. Sargent v. Tahash 160 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1968
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240 , 141 N. W. (2d) 15 .
State Ex Rel. Lillemoe v. Tahash 159 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1968
State Ex Rel. Lillemoe v. Tahash 159 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1968
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240 , 141 N. W. (2d) 15 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by