Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 141 N.W.2d 517.

255 citing documents.

Effinger v. State 380 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1986
Effinger v. State 380 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1986
See State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 404 , -25 (1966).
Langdon v. State 375 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1985
Langdon v. State 375 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1985
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 404 , -25 (1966).
Langdon v. State 371 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Langdon v. State 371 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“In deciding whether two or more intentional crimes were part of the same course of conduct, one must focus on the factors of time and place and also consider whether the segments of conduct involved were motivated by an effort to obtain a single criminal objective.” (citing State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 404 , ).
State v. Andersen 370 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Andersen 370 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 405 , ).
Effinger v. State 368 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Effinger v. State 368 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 399 , -22 (1966).
State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The “underlying policy [of the statute] is to protect an accused from being unduly harassed by repeated prosecutions for the same conduct until a desired result is accomplished.” State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 400 , (footnote omitted).
STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson 358 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson 358 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394 , the court set out the following test to determine whether each traffic violation charged results from a single behavioral incident: [Violations of two or more traffic statutes result from a single behavioral incident where they occur at substantially the same time and place and arise out of a
Paripovich v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment Co. 358 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Paripovich v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment Co. 358 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 397 , (comments such as these are reliable indicators of the intended application and scope of a statute).
State v. Jackson 349 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Jackson 349 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 404-405
State v. Zimmerman 352 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Zimmerman 352 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
ng whether nonintentional crimes or a mixture of nonintentional and intentional crimes were part of the same course of conduct, one must analyze the facts and determine whether the offenses “[arose] out of a continuing and uninterrupted course of conduct, manifesting an indivisible state of mind or coincident errors of judgment.” State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 405
State v. Blue 327 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
State v. Blue 327 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
tentional crimes or a mixture of nonintentional and intentional crimes were part of the same course of conduct is to analyze the facts and determine whether the offenses “[arose] out of a continuing and uninterrupted course of conduct, manifesting an indivisible state of mind or coincident errors of judgment.” (citations omitted); State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 405
State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
mining whether nonintentional crimes or a mixture of nonintentional and intentional crimes were part of the same course of conduct is to analyze the facts and determine whether the offenses “[Arose] out of a continuing and uninterrupted course of conduct, manifesting an indivisible state of mind or coincident errors of judgment.” State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 405 , d *82 517, 525 (1966).
State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
whether nonintentional crimes or a mixture of nonintentional and intentional crimes were part of the same course of conduct is to analyze the facts and determine whether the offenses “[arose] out of a continuing and uninterrupted course of conduct, manifesting an indivisible state of mind or coin *926 cident errors of judgment.” State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 405
State v. Scott 298 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1980
State v. Scott 298 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1980
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
City of Moorhead v. Miller 295 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1980
City of Moorhead v. Miller 295 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1980
In traffic cases such as this one the appropriate test in determining whether offenses arose from the same behavioral incident is whether the offenses “[arose] out of a continuous and uninterrupted course of conduct, manifesting an indivisible state of mind or coincident errors of judgment.” State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 405
State v. Adams 295 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1980
State v. White 292 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1980
State v. White 292 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1980
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
State v. Eaton 292 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
State v. Eaton 292 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 399
Mercer v. State 290 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1980
Mercer v. State 290 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1980
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980
State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980
Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353 , State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394
State v. Hudson 281 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1979