Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Duhn v. Tahash, 147 N.W.2d 382.

53 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377, 382-83, but this case appears to have no relevance to his argument, and may even undercut his argument.
  • State v. Nerz 572 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Nerz 572 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377, 381
  • State v. Wiley 205 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Wiley 205 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1973
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377
  • State v. Harbitz 198 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Harbitz 198 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1972
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377
  • State v. LaBarre 195 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1972
  • State v. LaBarre 195 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1972
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377
  • Simberg v. State 179 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1970
  • Simberg v. State 179 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1970
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • Broberg v. State 176 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1970
  • Broberg v. State 176 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1970
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 , that a defendant must challenge his arrest at or before arraignment or he waives any objection *74 to the manner in which he was arrested.
  • State v. Limberg 175 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Limberg 175 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1970
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Musta 170 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Musta 170 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1969
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • State v. Burch 170 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Burch 170 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1969
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • Riebe v. State 164 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1969
  • Riebe v. State 164 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1969
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 (unlawful arrest); State ex rel.
  • State v. Mitchell 163 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Mitchell 163 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1968
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 ; Giordenello v. United States, 357 U. S. 480 , 78 S. Ct. 1245 , 2 L. ed. (2d) 1503; Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U. S. 108 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L. ed. (2d) 723; Barnes v. Texas, 380 U. S. 253 , 85 S. Ct. 942 , 13 L. ed. (2d) 818.
  • State v. Madison 160 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Madison 160 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1968
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 , undated but served on the state on December 20, 1966, was also denied on January 6, 1967.
  • State v. Beltowski 160 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Beltowski 160 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1968
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 , that it be signed by a magistrate upon a showing of probable cause.
  • State v. Campbell 161 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Campbell 161 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1968
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • State v. Plant 159 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Plant 159 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1968
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • State v. Suess 159 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Suess 159 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1968
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377, 380 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382, 385 , we said: “* * * [I]t is not necessary that each allegation be independently documented or each fact leading to complainant’s conclusion be spelled out.
  • State v. Boerner 157 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Boerner 157 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1968
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 , we held that although the arrest of the defendant in that case was illegal, nevertheless, the trial court did have jurisdiction to accept the guilty plea, and the defendant waived his right to object to the manner of his arrest by not raising the issue prior to entering his plea.
  • City of St. Paul v. Tobler 153 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1967
  • City of St. Paul v. Tobler 153 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1967
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 , and State v. Paulick, 277 Minn. 140 , 151 N. W. (2d) 591 , is that determination of probable cause for arrest is a judicial function that cannot constitutionally be delegated to clerks.
  • State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
  • State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , State ex rel.
  • State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 (unlawful arrest); State ex rel.
  • State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1967
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • State v. Paulick 151 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Paulick 151 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1967
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 , was handed down.
  • State v. Linehan 150 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Linehan 150 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1967
    Duhn v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 377 , 147 N. W. (2d) 382 ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Ramsey County District Court 150 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1967