Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Reiland, 142 N.W.2d 635.
- State v. Wybierala 235 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1975
-
State v. Wybierala
235 N.W.2d 197
Minn. 1975
1 See, State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394 , State v. Gladden, 274 Minn. 533 , State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , State v. Harris, 277 Minn. 351 , State v. Murphy, 277 Minn. 355 , ; State ex rel.
- State v. White 219 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1974
-
State v. White
219 N.W.2d 89
Minn. 1974
Respondent cites the basic policy of the act as “to protect against exaggerating the criminality of a person’s conduct by making both punishment and prosecution commensurate with culpability.” State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121, 125
- State v. Wheat 206 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1973
-
State v. Wheat
206 N.W.2d 655
Minn. 1973
In State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , we held that the conduct constituting the offense of driving after revocation was separate and distinct from the conduct constituting the offense of criminal negligence, and, therefore, that a conviction for driving after revocation did not bar a subsequent prosecution for criminal negligenc
- State v. Finn 203 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1972
-
State v. Finn
203 N.W.2d 114
Minn. 1972
The following cases held that the offenses were separate behavioral incidents: State v. Reiland, 274 *522 Minn. 121, (driving after revocation of license and criminal negligence); State v. Murphy, 277 Minn. 355 , (drunkenness and unauthorized use of motor vehicle); State v. Kooiman, 289 Minn. 439 , (drunkenness and criminal negligence).
- State v. Carlson 192 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Carlson
192 N.W.2d 421
Minn. 1971
In State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , the defendant was charged with driving after revocation of his license, to which he pled guilty.
- State v. Kooiman 185 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Kooiman
185 N.W.2d 534
Minn. 1971
All such offenses may be included in one prosecution which shall be stated in separate counts.” Construing this statute in State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635 , we noted with emphasis that any decision interpreting the statute depends upon the facts and circumstances of the case.
- State v. Corning 184 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Corning
184 N.W.2d 603
Minn. 1971
Under these circumstances, there exists a substantial relationship between the conduct constituting the violations, and the statute prohibits both double punishment and serialized prosecutions.” This test was further qualified in State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121, 123 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635, 637 , in which we said: “* * * Whether the violations result from a single behavioral incident depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case.” The state contends that the two offenses involved in the com
- State v. Gamelgard 177 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1970
-
State v. Gamelgard
177 N.W.2d 404
Minn. 1970
See, State v. Moller, 276 Minn. 185 , 149 N. W. (2d) 274 ; State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635 .
- State v. Boucher 176 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1970
-
State v. Boucher
176 N.W.2d 624
Minn. 1970
The case of State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635 , again raised the question of whether an uninterrupted course of driving could give rise to two or more prosecutions and sentences under § 609.035.
- State v. Musta 170 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1969
-
State v. Musta
170 N.W.2d 341
Minn. 1969
Little, if any, attention is given to court decisions which, in effect, state that our liberties are seriously threatened if obscene or radical literature is not permitted on a news stand or, conversely, if an innocuous prayer is permitted in the schools,’ he said.” See, State v. Shevchuk, 282 Minn. 182 , 163 N. W. (2d) 772 ; State v. Murphy, 277 Minn. 355 , 152 N. W. (2d) 507 ; State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635 ; State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394 , 141 N. W. (2d) 517 ; Note, 50
- State v. Krampotich 163 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1968
- State v. Shevchuk 163 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1968
-
State v. Shevchuk
163 N.W.2d 772
Minn. 1968
In State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121, 125 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635, 638 , we related the statute to a basic policy “to protect against exaggerating the criminality of a person’s conduct by making both punishment and prosecution commensurate with culpability,” and observed that the rule must be refined under case-by-case application.
-
State v. Krampotich
163 N.W.2d 772
Minn. 1968
In State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121, 125 , , we related the statute to a basic policy "to protect against exaggerating the criminality of a person's conduct by making both punishment and prosecution commensurate with culpability," and observed that the rule must be refined under case-by-case application.
- State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. Tahash 161 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1968
-
State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. Tahash
161 N.W.2d 667
Minn. 1968
City of Bloomington v. Kossow, 269 Minn. 467 , 13 N. W. (2d) 206 ; State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 405 , 141 N. W. (2d) 517, 525 ; State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121, 124 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635, 638 ; State v. Gladden, 274 Minn. 533 , 144 N. W. (2d) 779 ; State v. Murphy, 277 Minn. 355 , 152 N. W. (2d) 507 ; State v. Gaulke, 281 Minn. 327 , 161 N. W. (2d) 662 .
- State v. Fleck 161 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1968
-
State v. Fleck
161 N.W.2d 309
Minn. 1968
See, State v. Harris, 277 Minn. 351 , 152 N. W. (2d) 728 ; State v. Murphy, 277 Minn. 355 , 152 N. W. (2d) 507 ; State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635 ; State v. Gladden, 274 Minn. 533 , 144 N. W. (2d) 779 ; State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394 , 141 N. W. (2d) 517 ; and City of Bloomington v. Kossow, 269 Minn. 467 , 131 N. W. (2d) 206 .
- State v. Murphy 152 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1967
-
State v. Murphy
152 N.W.2d 507
Minn. 1967
City of Bloomington v. Kossow, 269 Minn. 467 , 131 N. W. (2d) 206 ; State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394 , 141 N. W. (2d) 517 ; State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , 142 N. W. (2d) 635 ; State v. Gladden, 274 Minn. 533 , 144 N. W. (2d) 779 .