Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Dugal v. Tahash, 153 N.W.2d 232.

45 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. *223 175, 177, ).
State v. Hunt 615 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2000
State v. Hunt 615 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2000
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177-78
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177
State v. Kieley 413 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Kieley 413 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177 , (determination of competency of witnesses is discretionary and is to be made by preliminary examination).
State v. Magee 413 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Magee 413 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177
State v. Hulin 412 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hulin 412 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 181
State v. Guy 409 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Guy 409 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 178
State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177-78 , ).
Kunz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kunz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
As to her testimony that the sample was drawn routinely, it is settled that “[djetermination of a person’s competency as a witness is within the sound discretion of the trial court_” State v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177
Moll v. State 351 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Moll v. State 351 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175 , See also People v. Byrnes, 33 N.Y.2d 343 , 352 N.Y.S.2d 913 , 308 N.E.2d 435 (1974).
State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177-78
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 178 , -35 (1967).
State v. Yahnke 336 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1983
State v. Yahnke 336 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1983
With respect to district court file number 81-12348-12351, we believe that a determination of the alleged victim’s competency as a witness should be made in accordance with principles expressed in State v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177 , and in 11 P. Thompson, Minnesota Practice, Evidence § 601.01 (1979).
State v. Pietraszewski 283 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1979
State v. Pietraszewski 283 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1979
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175
State v. Johnson 256 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 1977
State v. Johnson 256 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 1977
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177 , : “Determination of a person’s competency as a witness is within the sound discretion of the trial court and is ordinarily made by such preliminary examination of the proposed witness as may be deemed necessary by the court.
State v. Lasley 236 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1975
State v. Lasley 236 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1975
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175 , State v. Whelan, 291 Minn. 83
State v. Shotley 233 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1975
State v. Shotley 233 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1975
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175
Ralph Hegman Company v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 198 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1972
Ralph Hegman Company v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 198 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1972
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175 , and when a deposition is sought to be introduced, the determination of the competency of the witness should be treated in the same manner.
State v. Whelan 189 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1971
State v. Whelan 189 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1971
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177 , 153 N. W. (2d) 232 , 234: “Determination of a person’s competency as a witness is within the sound discretion of the trial court and is ordinarily made by such preliminary examination of the proposed witness as may be deemed necessary by the court.
State v. Tribblet 162 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1968
State v. Tribblet 162 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1968
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175, 177 , 153 N. W. (2d) 232, 234 , this court said: “Determination of a person’s competency as a witness is within the sound discretion of the trial court and is ordinarily made by such preliminary examination of the proposed witness as may be deemed necessary by the court.
State v. Carlson 158 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1968
State v. Carlson 158 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1968
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175 , 153 N. W. (2d) 232 .
State v. Brown 153 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1967
State v. Brown 153 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1967
Dugal v. Tahash, 278 Minn. 175 , 153 N. W. (2d) 232 .