Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Linehan, 150 N.W.2d 203.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
There is no “absolute right on the part of a defendant to plead guilty,” but a court may, in its discretion, “allow [a defendant] to do so in proper cases .”
Minn. 2019
In support of t his argument, which he contends holds that he has an absolute right to plead guilty to the second-degree murder charge.
State v. Petersen 910 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
State v. Petersen 910 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
e evidence presented establishes probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed a different offense from that charged in the complaint, and the prosecutor intends to charge the defendant with that offense"); see also State v. Bluhm , , 24 (Minn. 1990) (noting that the State is "relatively free" to amend its criminal complaint in pre-trial proceedings); State v. Linehan , 276 Minn. 349 , , 206 (1967) (holding that there is no "absolute right on the part of a defendant to plead guilty,
State of Minnesota v. LaQuinn Jamul Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. LaQuinn Jamul Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, e.g., State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349, 358
State v. Martinez-Mendoza 804 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
Alejandro v. Harrison 219 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Pero 590 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1999
State v. Pero 590 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1999
(holding that "[n]either the constitution nor our Rules of Criminal Procedure give to a criminal defendant an absolute right to have his plea of guilty accepted”); see also State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349, 353 , (holding that there is no "absolute right on the part of a defendant to plead guilty,” but a court may, in its discretion, "allow [a defendant] to do so in proper cases”).
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Rather, the trial court in its discretion may allow a defendant to plead to less than the entire indictment “in proper cases.” State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349, 353 , see also Minn.R.Crim.P.
Matter of Linehan 503 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Linehan 503 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Linehan, 282 Minn. 254 , State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349
Severson v. State 188 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1971
Severson v. State 188 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1971
Nor do I agree that the statutory right to a preliminary hearing is a basic constitutional right that cannot be waived.” Beck v. Washington, 369 U. S. 541 , 82 S. Ct. 955 , 8 L. ed. (2d) 98; State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349 , 150 N. W. (2d) 203 ; State v. Strickland, 27 Wis.
State v. Mitchell 163 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1968
State v. Mitchell 163 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1968
See, also, State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349 , 150 N. W. (2d) 203 .
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
See, also, State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349 , 150 N. W. (2d) 203 ; State ex rel.
State v. Pooley 153 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1967
State v. Pooley 153 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1967
See, State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349 , 150 N. W. (2d) 203 ; State v. Clifford, 267 Minn. 554 , 126 N. W. (2d) 258 .
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
See, State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349 , ; State v. Clifford, 267 Minn. 554 , .
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
See, State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349 , 150 N. W. (2d) 203 ; State v. Clifford, 267 Minn. 554 , 126 N. W. (2d) 258 .