DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Minton, 149 N.W.2d 384.

24 citing documents.

  • Nicholas Patrick Pankuch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    For example, a manifest injustice may exist if a district court “lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter” or if a defendant “was not adequately afforded th e advice of competent counsel.” ( ).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    (“Theft is neither a lesser degree of burglary nor a crime necessarily proved upon proof of burglary.”).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    30, 2010 ), and as a result, “[t]heft is neither a lesser degree of burglary nor a crime necessarily proved upon proof of burglary,” State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213, 2 15
  • Vang v. State 788 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2010
  • Vang v. State 788 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2010
    See State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213, 217 , State ex rel.
  • State v. Jarvis 649 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Jarvis 649 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    2(2) (2000) (defining theft as intentionally and without claim of right taking the movable property of another without the other’s consent and with intent to deprive owner permanently of possession); State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213, 215 , (stating crime of theft is not lesser included offense of burglary).
  • State v. Nodes 538 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Nodes 538 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    See, e.g., Lange, 295 Minn. at 323 , d at 208 (judgment entered without service of process is unenforceable); -21 (Minn.1988) (order unenforceable because no territorial jurisdiction); State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213, 217 , (order by a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction is void).
  • State v. Williams 403 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Williams 403 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Further, in State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213, 215 , the supreme court noted that theft is not a crime necessarily proved upon proof of burglary.
  • State v. McAllister 399 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. McAllister 399 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213, 219
  • State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
    State v. Biehoffer, 269 Minn. 35 , State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213
  • State v. Rogers 545 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1976
  • State Ex Rel. Radke v. Tahash 166 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1969
  • State Ex Rel. Radke v. Tahash 166 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1969
    State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213 , 149 N. W. (2d) 384 .
  • Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
  • Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
    State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213 , 149 N. W. (2d) 384 , where defendant pled guilty to theft although not properly charged with the offense.
  • State Ex Rel. Schuler v. Tahash 154 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1967
  • State Ex Rel. Schuler v. Tahash 154 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1967
    Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 ; State *311 v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213 , 149 N. W. (2d) 384 .
  • State Ex Rel. Oney v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1967
  • State Ex Rel. Oney v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1967
    10 Cf. State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213 , 149 N. W. (2d) 384 .