Benson Cooperative Creamery Association v. First District Association
Cited by
- Glacial Plains Coop. v. Chippewa Valley Ethanol Co., LLLP 912 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2018
- Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Chippewa Valley Ethanol Co. 897 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
- Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co. 503 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Harris v. Mardan Business Systems, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Hayes v. Northwood Panelboard Co. 415 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Huygen v. Plums Enterprises of St. Paul, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Terfehr v. Kleinfehn 352 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Peterson v. Sorlien 299 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1980
- Ward v. National Car Rental System 290 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1980
Opinion text
152 N.W.2d 182 (1967) BENSON COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. FIRST DISTRICT ASSOCIATION, et al., Respondents. No. 40344. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 7, 1967. Barnard, Hilleren & Spates, Benson, Hall, Frazier & Crokin, Indianapolis, Ind., for appellant. Erickson, Popham, Haik & Schnobrick and Rolfe A. Worden, Minneapolis, amicus curiae. Doherty, Rumble & Butler and Harold Jordan, St. Paul, George H. Neperud, Dassel, for respondents. OPINION PER CURIAM. Appeal from clerk's taxation of costs. In this case plaintiff was appellant and defendants respondents. Defendants interposed a cross-appeal. Plaintiff prevailed on one issue and defendants prevailed on other issues. Plaintiff has taxed costs in the sum of $1,583.99 and defendants have taxed costs in the sum of $259 on their cross-appeal. Much of plaintiff's costs relates to the printing of the record, a large part of which involved the issues on which defendants prevailed. The costs should be apportioned between them. The total costs taxed *183 by plaintiff and defendants together amount to the sum of $1,842.99. One-half thereof is $921.50. Deducting costs taxed by defendants leaves a balance of $662.50. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff be allowed costs and disbursements in the sum of $921.50 from which there shall be deducted the sum of defendants' costs amounting to $259, leaving a balance in favor of plaintiff of $662.50.