DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Haas, 159 N.W.2d 118.

39 citing documents.

  • State v. Nelson 842 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2014
  • State v. Nelson 842 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2014
    See Leathers, d at 611 (applying the rule of lenity in similar circumstances to conclude that the phrase "full term of imprisonment” means two-thirds of a defendant’s executed sentence); (adopting the narrower of two reasonable interpretations of a statute using the rule of lenity); State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , (applying, among other things, the rule of lenity in concluding that "even though the offense charged might fall within the apparent policy of the statute, it was not intended to b
  • State v. Lee 693 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, Vin: 1JCMT7840HTI07485 650 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 2002
  • Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, Vin: 1JCMT7840HTI07485 650 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 2002
    State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200-01
  • State v. Colvin 645 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Colvin 645 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2002
    (citing State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200-01 , ).
  • State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    However, “penal statutes must be construed strictly; any reasonable doubt must be interpreted in favor of the defendant.” -76 (Minn.App.1984) ( State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , ).
  • State v. Coauette 601 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Coauette 601 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    See State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200-01 , (broad definition of a term inappropriate if definition creates crimes not contemplated by legislature).
  • In Re the Welfare of A.C.N. 583 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • In Re the Welfare of A.C.N. 583 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200
  • In re the Welfare of L.G.S. 568 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • In re the Welfare of L.G.S. 568 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , and Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , State v. Moseng, 254 Minn. 263, 269 , People v. Rehkopf 422 Mich.
  • State v. Brown 433 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Brown 433 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    See State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , (construing Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Serstock 402 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Serstock 402 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1987
    See State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200
  • State v. Lewis 394 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lewis 394 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    In State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197 , the Minnesota Supreme Court dealt with the interpretation of the term “writing” within the meaning of a state statute prohibiting persons from depositing in post offices within the state “any obscene book, magazine, pamphlet, paper, writing, * * * or other article which is obscene.” The court
  • State v. Ford 377 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Ford 377 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197 , , (1968), U.S. v. Bramblett, 348 U.S. 503, 509 , 75 S.Ct.
  • State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
    See also State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197 , State v. End, 232 Minn. 266
  • State v. Layman 376 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Layman 376 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    App.1984), (); State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , ).
  • State v. Andow 372 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Andow 372 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Penal statutes, particularly felony statutes, “must be construed strictly; any reasonable doubt must be interpreted in favor of the defendant.” see State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197
  • State v. Green 351 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Green 351 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See, State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197
  • State v. Ward 349 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Corbin 343 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Corbin 343 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200
  • State v. Olson 325 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Olson 325 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
    State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197