Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Konantz v. Stein, 167 N.W.2d 1.

34 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The object of Minnesota’s Torrens law “is to afford a method of acquiring a decree of registration and a certificate of title free, so far as possible, from all encumbrances and adverse claims not noted on the certificate.” Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 37
Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(quotation and citation omitted) (emphasis added); see also Anderson, d at 384-85 ; Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 42-43 , (“A prospective purchaser dealing with realty in possession of one other than the vendor is bound to make inquiry of the occupant and to ascertain the nature and extent of the occupant’s interest.
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
establishment of a practical boundary line.”); Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 36 , (discussing whether the plaintiffs “had acquired title to the land in controversy ...
Petition of Geis 576 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Petition of Geis 576 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 37
Petition of McGinnis 536 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Petition of McGinnis 536 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
§ 508.25 (1994); see also Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 37
Petition of Building D, Inc. 502 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Petition of Building D, Inc. 502 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 36 , the supreme court indicated that once title is registered, it is impossible to thereafter acquire title to the registered land by holding adversely to the registered owner.
Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two Harbors 487 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two Harbors 487 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
at n. 4; Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 42 , Farmers State Bank of Eyota v. Cunningham, 182 Minn. 244, 246 , 234 N.W.
Application of Morlock 431 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Application of Morlock 431 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 37
Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co. 387 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co. 387 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Such a statute is a departure from the general rule that a party cannot be compelled to resort to legal proceedings before discovering its claim or injury, Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33 , nevertheless, it may satisfy due process standards if the absolute repose it furnishes is justified by public policy.
Marsh v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marsh v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 36
Kelley v. Moe 387 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kelley v. Moe 387 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Respondents’ reliance on Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33 , is misplaced.
In Re the Brainerd National Bank 383 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1986
In Re the Brainerd National Bank 383 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1986
McCrossan, Inc. v. Builders Finance Co., 304 Minn. 538 , (clerical errors), In re Petition of Estate of Koester, 297 Minn. 387 , Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33 , (no actual notice of Torrens proceedings given the party in possession of the property); and Baart v. Martin, 99 Minn. 197 , 108 N.W.
Nash v. Mahan 377 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nash v. Mahan 377 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 47
Grandnorthern, Inc. v. West Mall Partnership 359 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Grandnorthern, Inc. v. West Mall Partnership 359 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33, 42-43
West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. Chilson 306 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1981
West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. Chilson 306 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1981
Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33
Anderson v. Graham Investment Co. 263 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1978
Anderson v. Graham Investment Co. 263 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1978
See, e. g., Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33 , Johnson v. Mugg, 261 Minn. 451 , Murphy v. Anderson, 128 Minn. 106 , 150 N.W.
Estate of Koester v. Hale 211 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1973
Estate of Koester v. Hale 211 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1973
We have recently reviewed the underlying purposes of our title registration law in Konantz v. Stein, 283 Minn. 33 , and in Moore v. Henricksen, 282 Minn. 509