Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Campbell, 161 N.W.2d 47.
- State v. Cooper 206 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1973
-
State v. Cooper
206 N.W.2d 356
Minn. 1973
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , is a Minnesota case involving a robbery not dissimilar in many respects to that in the instant case.
- State v. Smith 203 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1972
-
State v. Smith
203 N.W.2d 348
Minn. 1972
While we consider it the better practice to put such information in the affidavit, “the primary concern is that the magistrate be sufficiently informed to make an independent determination, and not how he is so informed.” State v. Burch, 284 Minn. 300, 307 , State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
- State v. Olek 179 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1970
-
State v. Olek
179 N.W.2d 320
Minn. 1970
Sipera v. State, 286 Minn. 536 , 175 N. W. (2d) 510 ; State v. Valstad, 282 Minn. 301 , 165 N. W. (2d) 19 ; State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , 161 N. W. (2d) 47 ; State v. LaJeunesse, 280 Minn. 381 , 159 N. W. (2d) 261 .
- Sipera v. State 175 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1970
-
Sipera v. State
175 N.W.2d 510
Minn. 1970
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , 161 N. W. (2d) 47 ; State v. Harrison, 279 Minn. 310 , 156 N. W. (2d) 763 ; State v. Holmes, 273 Minn. 223 , 140 N. W. (2d) 610 ; State v. Collins, 270 Minn. 581 , 132 N. W. (2d) 802 ; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 .
- State v. Hyleck 175 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1970
-
State v. Hyleck
175 N.W.2d 163
Minn. 1970
To implant in the mind of this jury a basis of prejudice, so that the jury will close its eyes to the law and to the facts.” 3 See, State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 12 , 161 N. W. (2d) 47, 55 ; State v. Keaton, 258 Minn. 359, 364 , 104 N. W. (2d) 650, 655 ; State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405, 407 , 145 N. W. (2d) 820 , 822; State v. Gowdy, 262 Minn. 70, 74 , 113 N. W. (2d) 578, 581 .
- State v. Doust 173 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1969
-
State v. Doust
173 N.W.2d 337
Minn. 1969
See, State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , 161 N. W. (2d) 47 .
- State v. Capelle 172 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1969
-
State v. Capelle
172 N.W.2d 556
Minn. 1969
The trial court’s determination of that issue must be affirmed in the light of the evidence before us. State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , 161 N. W. (2d) 47 .
- Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968