Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Holmes, 161 N.W.2d 650.
- State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
- Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
-
Bangert v. State
282 N.W.2d 540
Minn. 1979
We do not believe that on resen-tencing the sentencing judge is bound by our holdings in State v. Holmes, 281 Minn. 294 , and State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , that upon reconviction or resentenc-ing the court is not authorized to impose a harsher sentence than that originally imposed.
- State v. Gilbert 268 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1978
-
State v. Gilbert
268 N.W.2d 576
Minn. 1978
State v. Holmes, 281 Minn. 294
- State v. Prudhomme 228 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1975
-
State v. Prudhomme
228 N.W.2d 243
Minn. 1975
609.035 against multiple punishment for multiple offenses arising from a single behavioral incident, and (2) the application of the policy, enunciated by this court in State v. Holmes, 281 *377 Minn. 294 , against penalizing criminal defendants who are successful on appeal.
- State v. Johnson 216 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1974
-
State v. Johnson
216 N.W.2d 904
Minn. 1974
In State v. Holmes, 281 Minn. 294 , we held that where a defendant is granted a new trial on appeal, the trial court may not impose a greater sentence after a subsequent conviction than was imposed after the first conviction.
- State v. Ackerley 207 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 1973
-
State v. Ackerley
207 N.W.2d 272
Minn. 1973
He declined to do so and now asserts that under the rule adopted in State v. Holmes, 281 Minn. 294 , the court was limited to the sentence proposed by the state.
- Beltowski v. State 183 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1971
-
Beltowski v. State
183 N.W.2d 563
Minn. 1971
State v. Holmes, 281 Minn. 294 , 161 N. W. (2d) 650 .
- Holmes v. State 166 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1969
-
Holmes v. State
166 N.W.2d 715
Minn. 1969
Appeals from a subsequent conviction for robbery are reported in State v. *521 Holmes, 273 Minn. 223 , 140 N. W. (2d) 610 ; and State v. Holmes, 281 Minn. 294 , 161 N. W. (2d) 650 .