Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wolske, 160 N.W.2d 146.

37 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B.D.D. and D.A.A., Parents Minn. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B.D.D. and D.A.A., Parents Minn. 2025
See, (explaining that “manifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is invalid” and that this standard is more demanding than the fair-and-just standard); (explaining that a manifest injustice occurs when a defendant is “induced” to plead guilty “by a form of official deceit or by means which are at least grossly unfair”); see also In re Welfare of Child.
Minn. 2025
See, (explaining that “manifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is invalid” and that this standard is more demanding than the fair-and-just standard); (explaining that a manifest injustice occurs when a defendant is “induced” to plead guilty “by a form of official deceit or by means which are at least grossly unfair”); see also In re Welfare of Child.
Barragan v. State 583 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1998
Barragan v. State 583 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1998
State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 469
Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
Id.; see also State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 473-74 , (allowing withdrawal of guilty plea to correct manifest injustice when state failed to abide by its promise and defendant “did not receive the benefits contemplated by the agreement”).
State v. Flournoy 535 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1995
State v. Flournoy 535 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1995
at 1692-93 ; State v. Wolske 280 Minn. 465, 472
State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
at 1692 ; State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 472
Brown v. State 481 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1992
Brown v. State 481 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1992
See State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 471-73 , -52 (1968).
Saliterman v. State 443 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Saliterman v. State 443 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 474-75
State v. Kunshier 410 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Kunshier 410 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465
State v. Ferraro 403 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Ferraro 403 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465
State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
See State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 469
Smude v. State 249 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1976
Smude v. State 249 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1976
In State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , , (1968), and State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , this court approved the practice of plea bargaining, saying that it should be conducted openly.
State v. Witte 245 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1976
State v. Witte 245 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1976
Cf. Santobello v. New York, 404 U. S. 257 , 92 S. Ct. 495 , 30 L. ed. 2d 427 (1971); State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465
State v. Hoaglund 240 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1976
State v. Hoaglund 240 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1976
cognized the A. B. A. Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty, 1 “as valuable guidelines from a responsible source,” have referred to them as “authoritative,” and have declared that “when persuaded, we intend to adopt them in order to bring our procedure into conformity with those [standards] which are found to improve the administration of justice.” State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 470
State v. Anderson 193 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1971
State v. Anderson 193 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1971
State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , A. B. A. Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty (Approved Draft, 1968) § 2.1.
State v. Loyd 190 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1971
State v. Loyd 190 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1971
State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , 160 N. W. (2d) 146 ; Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488 , 181 N. W. (2d) 867 .
Beltowski v. State 183 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1971
Beltowski v. State 183 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1971
He did not claim that withdrawal was necessary to correct a manifest injustice such as a denial of fundamental rights, or a failure of the prosecution to fulfill its part of a plea agreement, or meet any of the requirements set out in Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 , and State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , 160 N. W. (2d) 146 .
Coolen v. State 179 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1970
Coolen v. State 179 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1970
This court has held in a number of recent cases that a district court is authorized to vacate a plea of guilty where the claim was made that (1) defendant was not adequately afforded the advice of competent counsel (State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , 139 N. W. [2d] 785); (2) an agreement made by the prosecution to induce *49 the plea was not fulfilled (State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , 160 N. W. [2d] 146); (3) the defendant did not understand the nature and elements of the offense charged and the c
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , 160 N. W. (2d) 146 .