Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. Obermeyer, 147 N.W.2d 358.

35 citing documents.

Anoka County, Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Minn. 2024
Anoka County, Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Minn. 2024
159 v. Obermeyer, d 358, 365–67 (Minn. 1966) (discussing the history of restrictions on public employees in organizing a labor union).
State v. Casino Marketing Group, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Casino Marketing Group, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Minneapolis Fed’n of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347, 356
State v. Christensen 439 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Christensen 439 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State, 304 Minn. 28, 39 , (citing Minneapolis Federation of Teachers Local v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347 , ).
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
347 n. 23 (Minn.1977); Minneapolis Federation of Teachers Local 59 v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347, 354
Ulland v. Growe 262 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1978
Ulland v. Growe 262 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1978
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 215 Minn. 347, 354
State v. Forge 262 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
State v. Forge 262 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
See, Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
(3 ed.) § 1669; Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347
Robbinsdale Education Ass'n v. Robbinsdale Federation of Teachers Local 872 239 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1976
Robbinsdale Education Ass'n v. Robbinsdale Federation of Teachers Local 872 239 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1976
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347
Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State 229 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1975
Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State 229 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1975
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Ober-meyer, 275 Minn. 347
Bodin v. City of St. Paul 227 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1975
Bodin v. City of St. Paul 227 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1975
3 Ordinance No. 3250, as amended, sets forth the details of this “merit system.” 4 See, also, Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347 , Fabio v. City of St.
Anderson v. Lappegaard 224 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1974
Anderson v. Lappegaard 224 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1974
5 Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347
State v. Andrews 212 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1973
Perry v. Independent School District No. 696 210 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1973
Perry v. Independent School District No. 696 210 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1973
No. 581 v. Mattheis, 275 Minn. 383 , Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347 , Board of Education v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202
Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka County 206 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1973
Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka County 206 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1973
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347
Head v. Special School District No. 1 182 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1970
Head v. Special School District No. 1 182 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1970
In Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347 , 147 N. W. (2d) 358 , this court indicated that the activities protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution *508 do not include strikes, stating ( 275 Minn. 358 , 147 N. W. [2d] 366): “* * * gven jn -¿he absence of a statute, we know of no authority which gives a public employee the right to strike.
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
The burden of proof in this respect is on the party seeking to set the law aside.’ Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347, 356
Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc. 175 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1970
Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc. 175 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1970
In Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347, 354 , 147 N. W. (2d) 358, 363 , we stated: “When the legislature has determined that a sufficient distinction exists between two classes of persons to justify applying rules to one class which do not apply to the other, such determination is binding upon the courts unless it appears that the distinction is purely fan
State v. Target Stores, Inc. 156 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1968
State v. Target Stores, Inc. 156 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1968
This court said in Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, 275 Minn. 347, 356 , 147 N. W. (2d) 358 , 365: *468 * * [W]e are committed to the principle that unless a law is unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt, it must be sustained.