Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hopp v. Hopp, 156 N.W.2d 212.
-
Davis v. Davis
158 N.W.2d 196
Minn. 1968
We have examined the contentions of the defendant in light of our recent decision in Hopp v. Hopp, 279 Minn. 170 , 156 N. W. (2d) 212 , and have concluded that the order finding him in contempt should be affirmed and that the order directing his confinement (if supplemented by a provision granting defendant freedom upon compliance either before or after his immurement begins) is within the power of the district court in the prop
- Noltimier v. Noltimier 157 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1968
-
Noltimier v. Noltimier
157 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 1968
Hopp v. Hopp, 279 Minn. 170 , 156 N. W. (2d) 212 ; Cozik v. Cozik, 278 Minn. 517 , 155 N. W. (2d) 471 .