DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Noltimier v. Noltimier, 157 N.W.2d 530.

63 citing documents.

  • Carpenter v. Woodvale, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1987
    Cf. Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28 , (pro se appellant is not relieved of the burden to provide an adequate record and preserve it in a settled case to enable review of questions he desires raised on appeal; error cannot be presumed).
  • Godbout v. Norton 262 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1977
  • Godbout v. Norton 262 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1977
    Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571 , Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28
  • Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. Collins 238 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1976
  • Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. Collins 238 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1976
    Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28
  • State Ex Rel. Barrett v. Korbel 221 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1974
  • State Ex Rel. Barrett v. Korbel 221 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1974
    Since defendant is a nonlawyer acting as attorney pro se, we might be inclined to disregard defendant’s failure to file a proper brief, but as we indicated in Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28 , we cannot as easily disregard an appellant’s failure to provide an adequate record because without an adequate record there is no way we can review a case.
  • Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co. 176 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1970
  • Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co. 176 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1970
    In reliance on Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28 , 157 N. W. (2d) 530 , plaintiff suggests that the appeal be dismissed.
  • Noltimier v. Noltimier 162 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1968
  • Noltimier v. Noltimier 162 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1968
    A prior appeal from an order finding plaintiff in contempt was dismissed in Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28 , 157 N. W. (2d) 530 .
  • Houge v. Houge 157 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1968
  • Houge v. Houge 157 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1968
    In the recent case of Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28 , 157 N. W. (2d) 530 , we said that “where an appellant acts as attorney pro se we are disposed to disregard defects resulting from failure to comply with the rules of this court relating to the contents of the brief, [but] that does not relieve appellant of the burden to provide an adequate record and preserve it in