DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Firoved v. General Motors Corporation, 152 N.W.2d 364.

113 citing documents.

  • Peters v. Waters Instruments, Inc. 251 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1977
    We stated in Firoved v. General Motors Corp. 277 Minn. 278, 283 , : “An order of dismissal on procedural grounds runs counter to the primary objective of the law to dispose of cases on the merits.
  • Zuleski v. Pipella 245 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1976
  • Zuleski v. Pipella 245 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1976
    The decision to dismiss necessarily depends upon the circumstances peculiar to each case, justice and equity to each party; and considered “with reference to ‘just, speedy and inexpensive’ *587 disposition of the case and the policy underlying the dismissal rules of preventing harassment and unreasonable delays in litigation.” Firoved v. General Motors Corp. 277 Minn. 278, 283
  • Beal v. Reinertson 215 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1974
  • Beal v. Reinertson 215 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1974
    In Firoved v. General Motors Corp. 277 Minn. 278, 283 , we said: “An order of dismissal on procedural grounds runs counter to the primary objective of the law to dispose of cases on the merits.
  • Stevens v. School Board of Independent School District No. 271 208 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1973
  • Stevens v. School Board of Independent School District No. 271 208 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1973
    Firoved v. General Motors Corp. 277 Minn. 278, 283
  • Independent School District No. 273 v. Gross 190 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1971
  • Independent School District No. 273 v. Gross 190 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1971
    Courts construing similar federal rules have uniformly held that they should be liberally construed in the interests of justice.” See, Firoved v. General Motors Corp. 277 Minn. 278, 283 , 152 N. W. (2d) 364, 368 ; Annotation, 5 A. L. R. Fed.
  • Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital Association 177 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1970
  • Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital Association 177 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1970
    Based upon that assumption and her understanding that the order of dismissal was granted solely upon the ground of a failure to comply strictly with the reinstatement order, plaintiff, relying upon Firoved v. General Motors Corp. 277 Minn. 278 , 152 N. W. (2d) 364 ; Dupay v. Krugers Inc. 285 Minn. 523 , 172 N. W. (2d) 567 ; and Wanek v. City of Winona, 78 Minn. 98 , , argues it was an abuse of discretion to order a judgment of dismissal with prejudice because (1) the 5-day delay in the pretrial
  • Dupay v. KRUGERS INCORPORATED 172 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1969
  • Dupay v. KRUGERS INCORPORATED 172 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1969
    In Firoved v. General Motors Corp. 277 Minn. 278 , 152 N. W. (2d) 364 , we stated that the factors to be considered in determining whether a dismissal should be with prejudice include the prejudicial effect of the order upon the parties and the amount of delay involved for the disposition of other cases.