DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fish v. Fish, 159 N.W.2d 271.

39 citing documents.

  • Rodgers v. Knauff 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
  • In Re Custody of NAK 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
  • In Re Custody of NAK 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
    See Wallin, 290 Minn. at 266 , d at 630 (citing Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , and Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , ).
  • Mize v. Kendall 621 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Mize v. Kendall 621 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    cf. Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316, 321 , (finding the principle that custody of young children is usually best vested in the mother subordinate to the "controlling principle that the overriding consideration in custody proceedings is the child’s welfare”) (citations omitted).
  • State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon 337 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
  • State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon 337 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
    592, 592 (1922), our more recent cases established a case-by-case approach instead of automatic suspension of the duty to support, see Michalson v. Michalson, 263 Minn. 356, 357, Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316, 323-24
  • Matter of Welfare of Mullins 298 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1980
  • Matter of Welfare of Mullins 298 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1980
    See also Erickson v. Erickson, 300 Minn. 559 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , and cases cited therein for the proposition that lower courts dealing with the issue of child custody and control are vested with broad discretion and should not be reversed on appeal unless an abuse is clearly shown.
  • Drew v. Drew 244 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1976
  • Drew v. Drew 244 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1976
    1(a) (b); Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , Borchert v. Borchert, 279 Minn. 16
  • Peterson v. Peterson 242 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1976
  • Peterson v. Peterson 242 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1976
    Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , Kiesow v. Kiesow, supra.
  • Hoffman v. Hoffman 227 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
  • Hoffman v. Hoffman 227 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
    Currier v. Currier, 271 Minn. 369 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205
  • Erickson v. Erickson 220 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1974
  • Erickson v. Erickson 220 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1974
    Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 [1968]; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 [1963]; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 [1961], The second principle is that the lower court is vested with broad discretion in determining custody matters and will not be reversed by an appellate court unles
  • Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
  • Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , Gannon v. Gannon, 258 Minn. 57 , Michalson v. Michalson, 263 Minn. 356 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , Smith v. Smith, 282 Minn. 190
  • Felsheim v. Felsheim 214 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1974
  • Felsheim v. Felsheim 214 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1974
    Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418 , Vandewege v. Vandewege, 284 Minn. 330 , Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , Krohn v. Krohn, 284 Minn. 95 , Hansen v. Hansen, 284 Minn. 1 , Smith v. Smith, 282 Minn. 190 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , Cozik v. Cozik, 279 Minn. 91 , Kucera v. Kucera, 275 Minn. 252 , Larkin v. Larkin, 261 Minn. 414 , Gannon v. Gannon, 258 Minn. 57 , and Albertson v. Albertson, 243 Minn. 212 , (
  • Ryg v. Kerkow 207 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1973
  • Ryg v. Kerkow 207 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1973
    Reiland v. Reiland, 290 Minn. 497 , Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316
  • LaBelle v. LaBelle 207 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1973
  • LaBelle v. LaBelle 207 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1973
    In changing custody from one parent to another, we have sometimes discussed the issue in terms of a showing that “the circumstances of the parties are markedly different from those * * * when the decree was rendered.” Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316, 320
  • Anderson v. Anderson 198 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1972
  • Anderson v. Anderson 198 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1972
    In this area, the law has been so exhaustively stated in our recent cases of Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , and, even more recently, in Reiland v. Reiland, 280 Minn. 444 , and Id.
  • Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
  • Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
    Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 ; Currier v. Currier, 271 Minn. 369 , 136 N. W. (2d) 55 ; Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , 170 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 .
  • Reiland v. Reiland 185 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1971
  • Reiland v. Reiland 185 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1971
    Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458 , , ; Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 ; 6A Dunnell, Dig.
  • Hanson v. Hanson 170 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1969
  • Hanson v. Hanson 170 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1969
    Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
    Thus, in Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 , this court held a close father-son relationship would support an award of custody of the son to the father.
  • Lindberg v. Lindberg 163 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1969
  • Lindberg v. Lindberg 163 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1969
    Price v. Price, 211 Minn. 565 , 2 N. W. (2d) 39 ; Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 .
  • Smith v. Smith 163 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1968
  • Smith v. Smith 163 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1968
    5 See, Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 ; Curry v. Felix, 276 Minn. 125 , 149 N. W. (2d) 92 ; State of Illinois ex rel.