DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. West, 173 N.W.2d 468.

46 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
    v. State, (quoting State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 197, ).
  • State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    See State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 197 , (“It is not for the courts to make, amend, or change the statutory law, but only to apply it.
  • RS v. State 459 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1990
  • R.S. v. State 459 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1990
  • RS v. State 459 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1990
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 197
  • State v. Turchick 436 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Turchick 436 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 197
  • Thompson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 412 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Thompson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 412 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 197
  • State v. Perkins 353 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Perkins 353 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1984
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 196 , 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein’s Evidence § 609(03) (1982).
  • Waller v. Powers Department Store 343 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1984
  • Waller v. Powers Department Store 343 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1984
    As we stated in State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 197 , “It is not for the courts to make, amend, or change the statutory law, but only to apply it.
  • State v. Stufflebean 329 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Stufflebean 329 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1983
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188
  • Johnson v. Johnson 277 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1979
  • Johnson v. Johnson 277 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1979
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188
  • State v. Jones 271 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Jones 271 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1978
    However, the trial court distinguished the Stewart case and denied the motion, stating that he felt that the general rule, reaffirmed in State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , required him to leave to the prosecutor the decision whether to use the prior convictions to impeach defendant.
  • State v. Taylor 264 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Holty 238 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Holty 238 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1976
    See, State v. Stewart, 297 Minn. 57 , State v. West, 285 Minn. 188
  • City of St. Paul v. DiBucci 229 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1975
  • City of St. Paul v. DiBucci 229 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1975
    176 (1934); State v. West, 285 Minn. 188
  • State v. Leinweber 228 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Leinweber 228 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1975
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Williams 210 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Williams 210 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1973
    6 See, State v. Cote, 108 N. H. 290, 235 A. 2d 111 (1967), certiorari denied, 390 U. S. 1025 , 88 S. Ct. 1412 , 20 L. ed. 2d 282 (1968); Luck v. United States, 121 App. D. C. 151, 348 F. 2d 763 (1965); State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , People v. Farrar, 36 Mich.
  • State v. Stevenson 209 N.W.2d 915 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Stewart 209 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Stewart 209 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1973
    This court has carefully reviewed its decision in State v. West, 285 Minn. 188
  • State v. Stevenson 209 N.W.2d 915 Minn. 1973
    As stated in State v. Stewart, 297 Minn. 57 , we are not disposed to overrule State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , as to use of prior convictions as impeachment of a defendant in a criminal proceeding.
  • State v. King 196 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1972
  • State v. King 196 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1972
    We are again invited to overrule our decision in State v. West, 285 Minn. 188
  • State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
    Spencer v. Texas, 385 U. S. 554 , 87 S. Ct. 648 , 17 L. ed. 2d 606 (1967); State v. Walter, 289 Minn. 309 , State v. Gravening, 289 Minn. 501 , State v. Lipscomb, 289 Minn. 511 , State v. Everson, 286 Minn. 246 , and State v. West, 285 Minn. 188
  • State v. Lipscomb 183 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Lipscomb 183 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1971
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , 173 N. W. (2d) 468 .
  • State v. Gravening 182 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Gravening 182 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1970
    595.07, as interpreted by this court in State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , 173 N. W. (2d) 468 , the prosecutor has a right to cross-examine a defendant regarding the fact of a conviction, the nature of the offense, and the identity of the defendant.
  • State v. Everson 175 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Everson 175 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1970
    State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , 173 N. W. (2d) 468 .
  • State v. Bond 173 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Bond 173 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1969
    However, in State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , 173 N. W. (2d) 468 , we recently considered the various impeachment rules, and we are not prepared to change the law in Minnesota.