DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Travelers Insurance Company v. Thompson, 163 N.W.2d 289.

36 citing documents.

  • Erik Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    (first-degree murder conviction precluded any claim as a beneficiary of the victim’s insurance policy ); -03 (Minn. App. 2012) (first-degree murder conviction precluded dispute over civil liability), review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013); see also Reed, d
  • Fain v. Andersen 816 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
  • Fain v. Andersen 816 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547, 558
  • State v. Lemmer 736 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
  • Noske v. Friedberg 670 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2003
  • Noske v. Friedberg 670 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2003
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547, 555
  • Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Reed 662 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 2003
  • Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Reed 662 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 2003
    The court framed the certified question as follows: When interpreting an intentional act exclusion of a common liability policy, does Minnesota law permit criminal convictions to be used for collateral estoppel purposes in a subsequent civil case in situations other than those envisioned in Travelers Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , [sic] — namely, where the criminal defendant seeks to profit from his/her crime in a subsequent civil proceeding?
  • Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Reed 647 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Reed 647 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , the Peschongs countered that a criminal conviction cannot be used as collateral estop-pel in a subsequent civil case unless the criminal defendant is attempting to profit from his or her crime, and that the issue of intent must be litigated in a coverage trial.
  • State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547, 552 , (citations omitted).
  • Johnson v. Gray 533 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Johnson v. Gray 533 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547, 558 , (defendant free to seek posteonviction relief at any time); Minn. Stat. § 590.01 , subd.
  • Krueger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 510 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Krueger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 510 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , (murder conviction bars killer’s recovery of life insurance covering decedent).
  • In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
  • In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
    See Travelers Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , see also Prosise v. Haring, 667 F.2d 1133 (4th Cir.1981), aff’d 462 U.S. 306 , *376 103 S.Ct.
  • Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Samuels 369 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Samuels 369 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Transamerica relies on the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision in Travelers Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , cert.
  • Nevins v. Christopher Street, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Nevins v. Christopher Street, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    The statute codifies the common law doctrine of collateral estoppel, a form of res judicata “whereby a former judgment is conclusive in a later suit between the same parties or their privies as to determinative issues finally decided in the former suit.” Travelers Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547, 551 , appeal dismissed, 395 U.S. 161 , 89 S.Ct.
  • Matter of Estate of Congdon 309 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1981
  • Matter of Estate of Congdon 309 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1981
    15 See generally Travelers Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , cert.
  • Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
  • Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
    See, Shimp v. Sederstrom, 305 Minn. 267 , The Travelers Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , appeal dismissed, 395 U.S. 161 , 89 S.Ct.
  • Simonson v. Bergstrom 235 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1975
  • Simonson v. Bergstrom 235 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1975
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547, 552 , appeal dismissed, 395 U. S. 161 , 89 S. Ct. 1647 , 23 L. ed. 2d 175 (1969): “* * * These authorities reflect a uniform wariness on the part of courts about permitting one whose guilt has been fully determined by proof beyond a reasonable doubt to embarrass the judicial process by p
  • Glens Falls Group Insurance Corp. v. Hoium 200 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 1972
  • Glens Falls Group Insurance Corp. v. Hoium 200 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 1972
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , *249 (1968), compels a holding that Sheehan is collaterally estopped from attacking the finality of his conviction and that his tort against Hoium was intentional and thus not covered.
  • Johnson & Peterson, Inc. v. Toohey 184 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1971
  • Johnson & Peterson, Inc. v. Toohey 184 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1971
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , 163 N. W. (2d) 289 , appeal dismissed, 395 U. S. 161 , 89 S. Ct. 1647 , 23 L. ed. (2d) 175; In re Estate and Guardianships of Williams, 254 Minn. 272 , 95 N. W. (2d) 91 .
  • Travelers Insurance v. Thompson 184 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1971
  • Travelers Insurance v. Thompson 184 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1971
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547 , 163 N. W. (2d) 289 .
  • Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
  • Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
    Co. v. Thompson, 281 Minn. 547, 558 , 163 N. W. (2d) 289, 296 , and cases cited.