DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Madison, 160 N.W.2d 680.

30 citing documents.

  • State v. Rodriguez 505 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Rodriguez 505 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170, 176-77 , -85 (1968), cert.
  • State v. Glidden 459 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Glidden 459 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    3 The statements admitted here are no more incriminating than the testimony in either State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , where appellant’s statement that “$68 of that [seized money] is mine” was admitted and found not to violate due process or right to a fair trial, id.
  • State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
    See State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , cert.
  • State v. Serna 290 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Serna 290 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1980
    State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170
  • State v. Bellcourt 251 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Bellcourt 251 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1977
    See, State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170
  • State v. Holbrook 233 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Holbrook 233 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1975
    Here, however, as in State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , an intentional elicitation case, the evidence of defendant’s guilt was so strong that it is very unlikely that the testimony played any substantial part in convincing the jury of defendant’s guilt.
  • State v. Richmond 214 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Richmond 214 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1974
    Here, however, as in State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , an intentional elicitation case, the evidence of defendant’s guilt was so strong that it is very unlikely that the testimony played any substantial part in convincing the jury of defendant’s guilt.
  • State v. Martin 211 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Martin 211 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1973
    Not only have we condemned such disclosures by the prosecution, State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , certiorari denied, 393 U. S. 102 , 89 S. Ct. 904 , 21 L. ed. 2d 796 (1969), but the prejudice here is compounded by the fact defendant was only 17 years of age, and under our law juvenile offenses are not crimes which can be used for impeachment.
  • Daly v. State, Department of Highways 207 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1973
  • Daly v. State, Department of Highways 207 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1973
    See, State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , certiorari denied, 893 U. S. 1102 , 89 S. Ct. 904 , 21 L. ed. 2d 796 (1969); State v. Carmichael, 275 Minn. 148
  • State v. Jones 196 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Jones 196 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1972
    See, State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , certiorari denied, 393 U. S. 1102 , 89 S. Ct. 904 , 21 L. ed. 2d 796 (1969).
  • Aird v. State 193 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1971
  • Aird v. State 193 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1971
    See, State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , certiorari denied, 393 U. S. 1102 , 89 S. Ct. 904 , 21 L. ed. 2d 796 (1969).
  • State v. Ulferts 181 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Ulferts 181 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1970
    We stated in State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , 160 N. W. (2d) 680 , certiorari denied, 393 U. S. 1102 , 89 S. Ct. 904 , 21 L. ed. (2d) 796, and State v. Steeves, 279 Minn. 298 , 157 N. W. (2d) 67 , that there is no specific rule in Minnesota as.to the length of time a suspect may be detained before being brought' before a magistrate, and from the standards expre
  • Simberg v. State 179 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1970
  • Simberg v. State 179 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1970
    He cites two cases: State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , 160 N. W. (2d) 680 , certiorari denied, 393 U. S. 1102 , 89 S. Ct. 904 , 21 L. ed. (2d) 796, and State v. Carmichael, 275 Minn. 148 , 145 N. W. (2d) 554 .
  • State v. Dubak 177 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Dubak 177 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1970
    State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , 160 N. W. (2d) 680 , certiorari denied, 393 U. S. 1102 , 89 S. Ct. 904 , 21 L. ed. (2d) 796.
  • State v. Clark 176 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Clark 176 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1970
    State v. Gluff, 285 Minn. 148 , 172 N. W. (2d) 63 ; State v. Madison, 281 Minn. 170 , 160 N. W. (2d) 680 .