Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Borst, 154 N.W.2d 888.

66 citing documents.

Wertheimer v. State 201 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1972
State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388 , Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U. S. 25 , 92 S. Ct. 2006 , 32 L. ed. 2d 530 (1972); cf. Comment, 45 Notre Dame Lawyer 351.
Welfare of Loyd v. Youth Conservation Commission 177 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1970
Welfare of Loyd v. Youth Conservation Commission 177 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1970
Any difference in treatment of members of the two classes of juveniles is certainly reasonable in light of the purpose of the Youth Conservation Act, 7 and nothing stated herein is inconsistent with State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388 , 154 N. W. (2d) 888 .
State v. Leininger 176 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1970
State v. Leininger 176 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1970
Relying on our decisions in State v. Paulick, 277 Minn. 140 , 151 N. W. (2d) 591 , and State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388 , 154 N. W. (2d) 888 , relator now contends that he is entitled to a jury trial in the municipal court as a matter of constitutional right.
City of St. Paul v. Page 173 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1969
City of St. Paul v. Page 173 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1969
We are of the opinion that the decision is here governed by the broad principles we adopted in State v. Paulick, 277 Minn. 140 , 151 N. W. (2d) 591 ; and State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388 , 154 N. W. (2d) 888 .
State v. Holmes 161 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1968
State v. Holmes 161 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1968
State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388, 389, note 1 , 154 N. W. (2d) 888, 889, note 1 .
State v. Freitag 161 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1968
State v. Freitag 161 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1968
State v. Paulick, 277 Minn. 140 , 151 N. W. (2d) 591 ; note, also, State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388 , 154 N. W. (2d) 888 ; State v. Illingworth, 278 Minn. 434 , 154 N. W. (2d) 687 .
City of Minneapolis v. Price 159 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1968
City of Minneapolis v. Price 159 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1968
The conduct of the trial here gives ready confirmation to our recent observation that “it is hardly conceivable that a person ignorant in the field of law can adequately defend himself without the assistance of counsel.” State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388, 398 , 154 N. W. (2d) 888, 894 .
State v. Collins 154 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1967
State v. Illingworth 154 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1967
State v. Illingworth 154 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1967
The case was heard and considered here at the same time and together with State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388 , 154 N. W. (2d) 888 .