DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Pittman v. Tahash, 170 N.W.2d 445.

40 citing documents.

  • State v. Parker 901 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2017
  • State v. Parker 901 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2017
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , (noting that we “cannot condone the actions” of a prosecutor who “ma[de] available for publication” various statements which “seriously threatened to have [an] effect upon prospective jurors residing in the community”), as well as ABA Standards of Conduct
  • State of Minnesota v. Devon Derrick Parker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Devon Derrick Parker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 370, 170, N.W.2d 445, 448 (1968), Parker has failed to show that any such prosecutorial misconduct affected his substantial rights under Griller.
  • Dobbins v. State 788 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 2010
  • Dobbins v. State 788 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 2010
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 368 , ).
  • Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
  • Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 368 , , 447 *521 (1969)).
  • Vance v. State 752 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2008
  • Vance v. State 752 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2008
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 368 , ).
  • Cuypers v. State 711 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 2006
  • Cuypers v. State 711 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 2006
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 368 , ), We review legal issues de novo.
  • Williams v. State 692 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2005
  • Williams v. State 692 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2005
    (citing Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 368 , ).
  • Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
  • Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 368
  • State v. Wiberg 296 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Wiberg 296 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1980
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365
  • State v. Raymond 232 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Raymond 232 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1975
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , the defendant made the first confession in the absence of warnings, and while incarcerated, to a prison superintendent; he made the second after appropriate warnings several hours later, while still incarcerated, to a sheriff.
  • State v. Dakota 217 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Dakota 217 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1974
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , the first confession was made in the absence of warnings to a prison superintendent, and the second was made after appropriate warnings, several hours later, to a sheriff.
  • State v. Robb 195 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Robb 195 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1972
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 368 , : “While we acknowledge our obligation to extend a broad review of both questions of law and fact in postconviction proceedings, in accordance with our responsibility to vindicate a denial of fundamental rights and thereby prevent manifest injustice [citing Kopetka v. State, 283 Minn
  • State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , this court held that a full oral confession, inadmissible because obtained without proper warnings, did not prejudicially taint a written confession obtained later in the day after proper warnings were given.
  • Skavene v. State 188 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1971
  • Skavene v. State 188 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1971
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , 170 N. W. (2d) 445 ; Adler v. State, 284 Minn. 31 , 169 N. W. (2d) 233 .
  • Bultman v. State 187 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1971
  • Bultman v. State 187 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1971
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365, 369 , 170 N. W. (2d) 445 , 447: “Where there is adequate evidence to sustain findings by a postconviction court on matters of fact, as in this case, and the findings are not manifestly and palpably contrary to the weight of the evidence, we are not inclined to substitute our view of the evidence for that of the post-
  • McMillen v. State 182 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1970
  • McMillen v. State 182 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1970
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , 170 N. W. (2d) 445 ; Chonis v. State, 287 Minn. 542 , 177 N. W. (2d) 810 .
  • Langer v. State 178 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1970
  • Langer v. State 178 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1970
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , 170 N. W. (2d) 445 .
  • Brown v. State 176 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1970
  • Loring v. State 176 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1970
  • Brown v. State 176 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1970
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , 170 N. W. (2d) 445 .
  • Loring v. State 176 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1970
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , 170 N. W. (2d) 445 .
  • Pratt v. State 175 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1970
  • Pratt v. State 175 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1970
    Pittman v. Tahash, 284 Minn. 365 , 170 N. W. (2d) 445 ; Pooley v. State, 284 Minn. 546 , 169 N. W. (2d) 397 ; Adler v. State, 284 Minn. 31 , 169 N. W. (2d) 233 ; Rollins v. State, 283 Minn. 482 , 168 N. W. (2d) 690 .