DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lindberg v. Lindberg, 163 N.W.2d 870.

30 citing documents.

  • McClelland v. Pierce 376 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1985
  • McClelland v. Pierce 376 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1985
    Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536
  • Marriage of Trebelhorn v. Uecker 362 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Trebelhorn v. Uecker 362 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Davis v. Davis, 306 Minn. 536 , Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536
  • Marriage of Lappi v. Lappi 294 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1980
  • Marriage of Lappi v. Lappi 294 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1980
    3 See, also, Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536, 537, n. 2 , n. 2 (1969), and Jones v. Jones, 242 Minn. 251
  • Davis v. Davis 235 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1975
  • Davis v. Davis 235 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1975
    Also, this court has held that minor children may be entrusted to one parent’s custody even if no specific finding of the other’s unfitness was made, Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , or even if both parents are found equally fit to have custody.
  • Hoffman v. Hoffman 227 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
  • Hoffman v. Hoffman 227 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
    1 We have previously held that minor children may be entrusted to the father’s custody even if no specific finding of the mother’s unfitness was made (Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , [1969]), or even if the parents are equally fit to have custody (Ryg v. Kerkow, 296 Minn. 265 , [1973]).
  • VanZee v. VanZee 226 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1974
  • Van Zee v. Van Zee 226 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1974
  • VanZee v. VanZee 226 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1974
    Stanford v. Stanford, 266 Minn. 250 , Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , State ex rel.
  • Van Zee v. Van Zee 226 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1974
    Stanford v. Stanford, 266 Minn. 250 , Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , State ex rel.
  • Erickson v. Erickson 220 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1974
  • Erickson v. Erickson 220 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1974
    Reiland v. Reiland, 290 Minn. 497 , Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316
  • Ryg v. Kerkow 207 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1973
  • Ryg v. Kerkow 207 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1973
    Reiland v. Reiland, 290 Minn. 497 , Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316
  • Reiland v. Reiland 185 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1971
  • Reiland v. Reiland 185 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1971
    Johnson v. Johnson, 223 Minn. 420 , 27 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 ; Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , 170 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Borchert v. Borchert, 279 Minn. 16 , 154 N. W. (2d) 902 ; Lobash v. Lobash, 283 Minn. 255 , 167 N. W. (2d) 43 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
  • High v. High 179 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1970
  • High v. High 179 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1970
    ving primary custody given to the mother, but the circumstances of Mrs. High’s employment and possible remarriage are such that a dramatic change in custody and reversal of living schedules are not indicated at this time.” Appealing directly from the order, plaintiff made no attempt by post-trial motion to request the court to make findings of fact supporting the order (see, Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 ,163 N. W. [2d] 870) or to persuade the trial judge to vacate its order sealing the tr
  • Anderson v. Anderson 179 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1970
  • Anderson v. Anderson 179 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1970
    Holmes v. Holmes, 253 Minn. 26 , 91 N. W. (2d) 79 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 .
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
    Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 277 Minn. 227, 229 , 152 N. W. (2d) 187, 189 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 .
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
    Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 ; Eisel v. Eisel, supra; Reiland v. Reiland, 280 Minn. 444 , 160 N. W. (2d) 30 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
  • Lobash v. Lobash 167 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1969
  • Lobash v. Lobash 167 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1969
    Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 .