Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 164 N.W.2d 629.

28 citing documents.

City of Wyoming v. Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings 735 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
City of Wyoming v. Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings 735 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bd., 282 Minn. 296, 300 , (stating that an administrative body acting quasi-judicially is not bound by the strict procedural rules that circumscribe the action of a court).
E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 603 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 603 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bd., 282 Minn. 296, 300 , (noting that receipt of incompetent evidence in a quasi-judicial proceeding is not fatal to an administrative determination).
Caldwell v. City of Minneapolis 486 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Caldwell v. City of Minneapolis 486 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bd., 282 Minn. 296, 299 , Ekstedt v. Village of New Hope, 292 Minn. 152, 162-63 , -28 (1972) (misconduct must be based on inadequate performance of duties); Hughes v. Department of Pub.
City of Minneapolis v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Minneapolis v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hagen v. Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296, 300
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
118, 120 (1893); Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296, 299 , ).
Bush v. City of St. Joseph 395 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bush v. City of St. Joseph 395 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 162-63 , d at 828 (quoting Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296, 299 , ).
Matter of Recommendation for Discharge of Kelvie 384 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of Recommendation for Discharge of Kelvie 384 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296 , the court explained further: Under this definition it appears that the cause or reason for dismissal must relate to the manner in which the employee performs his duties, and the evidence showing the existence of reasons for dismissal must be substantial.
Thompson v. City of Appleton 366 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thompson v. City of Appleton 366 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
118, 120 (1893); Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296, 299 , ).
Leininger v. City of Bloomington 299 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1980
Leininger v. City of Bloomington 299 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1980
Van Hoof v. City of Burnsville 275 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1979
Van Hoof v. City of Burnsville 275 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1979
See Ekstedt v. New Hope, 292 Minn. 152 , and Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296
In Re the Discipline of Setchell 261 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1977
In Re the Discipline of Setchell 261 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1977
Thoreson v. Civil Service Comm., Minn., Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296 , State ex rel.
Rosen v. Minnesota Civil Service Board 204 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1973
Rosen v. Minnesota Civil Service Board 204 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1973
Hagen v. Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296
Ekstedt v. Village of New Hope 193 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1972
Ekstedt v. Village of New Hope 193 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1972
In Gibson v. Civil Service Board, 285 Minn. 123 , and Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296 , the term “just cause” was discussed, and both cases quote language from State ex rel.
Gibson v. Civil Service Board 171 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1969
Gibson v. Civil Service Board 171 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1969
See, Hagen v. State Civil Service Board, 282 Minn. 296 , 164 N. W. (2d) 629 , where this court held that testimony before the State Civil Service Board of prior *126 breaches of duty by an employee may be properly received as bearing upon his competence and efficiency in performing his work.