Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cady v. Bush, 166 N.W.2d 358.

58 citing documents.

Serene E. Warren, as beneficiary of the 2011 Arizona NG Trust 102, 8008 Meadow Trust 102, 2011 Lafayette … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
other situations where it would be morally wrong for one party to enrich himself at the expense of another.” -62 (Minn. 1969).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Courts are not warranted in interfering with the contract rights of parties as evidenced by their writings which purport to express their full agreement.”
David Carl Hepfl v. Jodine Patrice Meadowcroft 9 N.W.3d 567 Minn. 2024
David Carl Hepfl v. Jodine Patrice Meadowcroft 9 N.W.3d 567 Minn. 2024
However, we have also held that enrichment is unjust “in other situations where it would be morally wrong for one party to enrich himself at the expense of another.” –62 (Minn. 1969) (emphasis added); see Klass v. Twin City Fed.
Paul Herlache, Minn. 2023
Co., 622 F.2d 1291, 1295 (8th Cir. 1980) (explaining that the equitable remedy of unjust enrichment developed from the common-law cause of action “money had and received”); (referring to “unjust enrichment” and “money had and received” interchangeably).
Katie Howard, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 the parties are governed by a valid contract.”) (); see also 17 Williston on Contracts, § 50:43 (4th Ed. 2015) (“[Equitable conversion is] subject not only to any agreement broadly abrogating the doctrine in the particular transaction, but any express provision of the agreement that might have a specific effect with respect to one or more isolated as
Pohocogo, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(quotation omitted); -62 (Minn. 1969) (“The theory of unjust enrichment .
Production Stamping, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110, -62 (1969) (construing the two claims as substantially similar).
Manor Warehouse & Delivery, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Id.; see also Cady v. Bush , 283 Minn. 105, 110, –62 (1969) (“The theory of unjust enrichment .
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
& Loan Ass’n, 291 Minn. 68, 71, -95 (1971); Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110, -62 (1969); Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co. of Detroit, Mich., 133 Minn. 360, 363, 158 N.W.
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110, –62 (1969) (stating that “[t]he theory of unjust enrichment or money had and received .
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
& Loan Ass’n, 291 Minn. 68, 69 , (concluding that lessee could recover on theory of unjust enrichment a portion of condemnation award from lessor intended to reimburse for real estate taxes); Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , -62 (1969) (concluding that unjust enrichment did not apply when purchasers of motel attempted to recover, upon cancellation of the contract, cash payments made to seller); Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 185-86 , -43 (1952) (concluding that findings supported de
Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 766 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110
Pollock-Halvarson v. McGuire 576 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Pollock-Halvarson v. McGuire 576 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , -62 (1969).
St. Croix Printing Equipment, Inc. v. Rockwell International Corp. 428 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
St. Croix Printing Equipment, Inc. v. Rockwell International Corp. 428 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Ram Construction 413 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Ram Construction 413 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 109 , (representations of expectation regarding future acts or events are nothing more than conjecture); pet.
1985 Robert Street Associates v. Menard, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1985 Robert Street Associates v. Menard, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See also Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , (courts should not interfere with the contract rights of parties as evidenced by their writing).
Kramer v. Bruns 396 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kramer v. Bruns 396 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 883 (citing Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 109 , ).
Timmer v. Gray 395 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Timmer v. Gray 395 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The theory of unjust enrichment is “founded on the principle that no one ought unjustly to enrich himself at the expense of another.” Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , (quoting Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co., 133 Minn. 360, 363 , 158 N.W.
Fort Dodd Partnership v. Trooien 392 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fort Dodd Partnership v. Trooien 392 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , -362 (1969).
Galante v. Oz, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Galante v. Oz, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , -362 (1969).
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Such representations are not treated as assertions of existing facts and amount to nothing more than conjectures of future events.” Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 109 , see also, Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Gatz v. Frank M. Langenfeld & Sons Construction, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Gatz v. Frank M. Langenfeld & Sons Construction, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 109
Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 109
Anderson v. DeLisle 352 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Anderson v. DeLisle 352 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Klass v. Twin City Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n, 291 Minn. 68, 71 , Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , -62 (1969).
United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological Board 307 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1981
United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological Board 307 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1981
See Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by