Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thill v. Modern Erecting Company, 170 N.W.2d 865.

60 citing documents.

Ditzler v. Spee 180 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1970
Ditzler v. Spee 180 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1970
3 Radmacher v. Cardinal, 264 Minn. 72 , 117 N. W. (2d) 738 ; McCarty v. Budget Rent-a-Car, 282 Minn. 497 , 165 N. W. (2d) 548 ; Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. 284 Minn. 508 , 170 N. W. (2d) 865 .
Thoen v. Hatton 177 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1970
Overruled Thoen v. Hatton 177 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1970
The rule of the Eschenbach case was overruled in Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. 284 Minn. 508, 514 , 170 N. W. (2d) 865, 870 , filed September 19, 1969, where, after carefully considering the problem of retroactivity, we declared: “Today’s decision is prospective and is applicable only with regard to personal injuries sustained from and after this date, except that it shall additionally apply to the instant ca
B. F. Griebenow, Inc. v. Anderson 177 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1970
B. F. Griebenow, Inc. v. Anderson 177 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1970
And the same concept was applied in Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. 284 Minn. 508 , 170 N. W. (2d) 865 (overruling our prior decisions precluding a wife’s action for loss of consortium).
Beaudette v. Frana 173 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1969
Beaudette v. Frana 173 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1969
Cf. the result in Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. 284 Minn. 508 , 170 N. W. (2d) 865 .
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 173 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1969
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 173 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1969
In Silesky v. Kelman, 281 Minn. 431 , 161 N. W. (2d) 631 , we abandoned the rule that a parent is immune from suit by a child arising out of a tort action, stating certain exceptions; and in Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. 284 Minn. 508 , 170 N. W. (2d) 865 , we adopted the rule that a wife is entitled to recover for loss of consortium.