Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Prow's Motel, Inc., 171 N.W.2d 83.

27 citing documents.

Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Lambrecht 663 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2003
Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Lambrecht 663 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2003
State v. Prow’s Motel, Inc., 285 Minn. 1, 4-5 , -86 (1969) (holding “that the power to determine whether some property right of a landowner has been taken or damaged in a constitutional sense [is] vested in the trial court”); see 27 Am.Jur.2d, Eminent Domain § 617 at 163-64 (1996) (stating that in general the district court “has the duty to
Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey 571 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey 571 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-13 (Minn.1981); State by Mattson v. Prow’s Motel, Inc., 285 Minn. 1, 5-6 , -86 (1969).
Matter of Minneapolis Com. Dev. Agency 417 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Minneapolis Com. Dev. Agency 417 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Prow's Hotel, 285 Minn. 1, 4-5 , -86 (1969).
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. City of Plymouth 263 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1978
Johnson v. City of Plymouth 263 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1978
See, Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 446 , , *606 173 (1964); State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14 , State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc., 285 Minn. 1 , Johnson Bros. Grocery v. State, Dept. of Highways, 304 Minn. 75
Johnson Bros. Grocery, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways 229 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1975
Johnson Bros. Grocery, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways 229 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1975
See, also, State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , Note, 49 Minn. L. Rev. 93 , 198.
Recke v. State 215 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1974
Recke v. State 215 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1974
State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , Gibson v. Commissioner of Highways, 287 Minn. 495
Prow's Motel, Inc. v. State 200 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1972
Prow's Motel, Inc. v. State 200 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1972
The facts are fully set forth in State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , and will not be again recited.
Lowry Hill Properties, Inc. v. STATE, BY HEAD 200 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1972
Lowry Hill Properties, Inc. v. STATE, BY HEAD 200 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1972
We held in Thomsen v. State, by Head, 284 Minn. 468 , and State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , that the issue of whether damages to private property constitute a taking in the constitutional sense is a matter of law to be decided solely by the court.
Klicker v. State 197 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1972
Klicker v. State 197 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1972
We agree that cases such as State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , Thomsen v. State, by Head, 284 Minn. 468 , and State, by Peterson, v. Anderson, 220 Minn. 139 , suggest that the writ of *155 mandamus is proper to compel eminent domain proceedings to compensate landowners for property interests taken or damage
Schmidt v. Village of Mapleview 196 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1972
Schmidt v. Village of Mapleview 196 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1972
See, State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , State, by Mondale, v. Gannons, Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436
Victor Co. v. State Ex Rel. Head 186 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1971
Victor Co. v. State Ex Rel. Head 186 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1971
It may be noted that the problem presented by this case is to be distinguished from those dealt with in the recent cases of State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , 171 N. W. (2d) 83 , and Thomsen v. State, by Head, 284 Minn. 468 , 170 N. W. (2d) 575 .
Gibson v. Commissioner of Highways 178 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1970
Gibson v. Commissioner of Highways 178 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1970
State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , 171 N. W. (2d) 83 .
State v. McAndrews 175 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1970
State v. McAndrews 175 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1970
Thomsen v. State, 284 Minn. 468 , 170 N. W. (2d) 575 ; State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , 171 N. W. (2d) 83 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by