Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gibson v. Civil Service Board, 171 N.W.2d 712.
- Buffalo Creek Watershed District v. Minnesota Water Resources Board 188 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1971
-
Buffalo Creek Watershed District v. Minnesota Water Resources Board
188 N.W.2d 923
Minn. 1971
In the recent case of Gibson v. Civil Service Board, 285 Minn. 123, 127 , 171 N. W. (2d) 712, 715 , we stated: “The functions of this court as applied to the matter before us are to determine whether the board’s action was arbitrary and capricious and whether there is substantial evidence, considering the record as a whole, to sustain the decision of the Civil Service Board.
- Quinn Distributing Company v. Quast Transfer, Inc. 181 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1970
-
Quinn Distributing Company v. Quast Transfer, Inc.
181 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 1970
See, for example, Gibson v. Civil Service Board, 285 Minn. 123, 126 , 171 N. W. (2d) 712, 715 , in which this court, reviewing under § 15.0425 a decision of the State Civil Service Commission, stated: <<* * * qijjg functions of factfinding, resolving conflicts in the testimony, and determining the weight to be given to it and the inferences to be drawn therefrom rest with t