Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gamelgard, 177 N.W.2d 404.

42 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Maria Pieternella Knight v. James Donald Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Maria Pieternella Knight v. James Donald Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 82
Vazquez v. State 822 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Vazquez v. State 822 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See 1967 Minn. Laws ch. 336, § 1, at 517; -39 (Minn.2005) (noting that, in enacting the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, which became effective in 1980, the legislature provided for “broad appellate review” of sentences); State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 78 , (“If the sentence is authorized by law, we cannot limit or amend it.”).
State v. Jones 745 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 2008
State v. Jones 745 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 2008
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 80
State v. Duncan 608 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Duncan 608 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The motion has also been granted where the brief does not conform to the rules of appellate procedure, -72 (Minn.App.1998), or where the “brief is used as a vehicle for disrespect, insult, and slanderous accusations.” State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 82
State v. Whitledge 500 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1993
State v. Whitledge 500 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1993
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 77-78
State v. Martinson 460 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Martinson 460 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 78
State v. Lambert 392 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1986
State v. Lambert 392 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1986
See State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74
State v. Lambert 388 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Lambert 388 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 77-78
State v. Chidester 380 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Chidester 380 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
609.-035); State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 81 , (“A single course of conduct under the statute is one behavioral incident, and the theft of different checks at different times is not such a single behavioral incident.”).
Effinger v. State 380 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1986
Effinger v. State 380 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1986
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 77-79 , -08 (1970).
State v. Kirsch 338 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1983
State v. Kirsch 338 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1983
§ 609.035 (1982), and State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74
Spears v. State 300 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1980
Spears v. State 300 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1980
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74 , applies, and we have no authority to review the sentence so long as it is one authorized by law, which it is.
State v. Eaton 292 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
State v. Eaton 292 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
A similar argument was flatly rejected by this court in State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74
Fritz v. State 284 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1979
Fritz v. State 284 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1979
See, State v. Dinneen, 289 Minn. 250 , State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74
State v. Arndt 260 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1977
State v. Arndt 260 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1977
Defendant’s contention that the court violated his right to equal protection of the laws by giving him a harsher sentence than his accomplice brother received from a different judge is answered negatively by this court’s decision in State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74
State v. McGlynn 195 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1972
State v. McGlynn 195 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1972
See, State v. Andrews, 282 Minn. 386, 390 , State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 78
McLaughlin v. State 190 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1971
McLaughlin v. State 190 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1971
1 We reiterate what this court stated in State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 80 , : “* * * We are not prepared at this time to hold that the appellate jurisdiction afforded to this court in all cases by our constitution embraces appellate review of sentences.
State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
This court faced this same issue in the recent case of State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74 , 177 N. W. (2d) 404 .
State v. Hanson 182 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
State v. Hanson 182 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
See, State v. Bohall, 280 Minn. 1 , 157 N. W. (2d) 845 ; State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74 , 177 N. W. *108 (2d) 404.
Steeves v. State 178 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1970
Steeves v. State 178 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1970
State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74 , 177 N. W. (2d) 404 .