Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 171 N.W.2d 201.

34 citing documents.

Jonathan v. Kvaal 403 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jonathan v. Kvaal 403 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
To rely on McCormick is to rely on Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32 , for the rule that if one is aware of the danger in the use of the product, there is no liability.
Kallio v. Ford Motor Co. 391 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kallio v. Ford Motor Co. 391 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
for rev. denied, (Minn.1985) (quoting Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 40 , ).
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 38-39 , (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A, comment g (1965)).
McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Awareness of defects In a strict product liability ease, a “plaintiff must not be aware of the defect in order to recover.” Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 40 , (plaintiff’s awareness of a protruding spark plug on snowmobile precluded his claim that a defect existed).
Paripovich v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment Co. 358 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Paripovich v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment Co. 358 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Thus, he has the burden of establishing that Hayden-Murphy supplied the defective equipment, see McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., Inc., 278 Minn. 322 , 338 n. 15, , 499 n. 15 (1967); Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 44 , and the proof must be such as to justify an inference of fact, not merely speculation or conjecture.
Rients v. International Harvester Co. 346 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rients v. International Harvester Co. 346 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Additionally, the plaintiff must show that the “injury was not caused by any voluntary, unusual or abnormal handling by the plaintiff.” Magnuson v. Rupp Mfg., Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 40 , see also Waite v. American Creosote Works, 295 Minn. 288
Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc. 324 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1982
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
See Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc., Magnuson v. Rupp Manufac *811 turing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 45 , (“the doctrine plaintiff seeks to recover, under is strict liability and not absolute liability” (emphasis in original)).
Gryc Ex Rel. Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp. 297 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1980
Gryc Ex Rel. Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp. 297 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1980
Karjaia v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 523 F.2d 155, 158 (8th Cir. 1975); see Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 38
Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota v. Dover Corp. 287 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1980
Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota v. Dover Corp. 287 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1980
See McCormack v. Hankscraft Co. Inc., 278 Minn. 822 , Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing Inc., 285 Minn. 32 , Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83
Armstrong v. Mailand 284 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1979
Armstrong v. Mailand 284 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1979
See, Busch v. Busch Const. Inc. supra; Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing Co., 285 Minn. 32
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Compare the majority and concurring opinions in Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32 , and Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 290 Minn. 321
O'LAUGHLIN v. Minnesota Natural Gas Co. 253 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1977
O'LAUGHLIN v. Minnesota Natural Gas Co. 253 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1977
Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 290 Minn. 321, 329 , Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83 , Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc., 285 Minn. 32, 46 , (Rogosheske, J., concurring specially).
Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 240 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 1976
Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 240 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 1976
Inc. 285 Minn. 32 , and Waite v. American Creosote Works, Inc. 295 Minn. 288
Waite v. American Creosote Works, Inc. 204 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1973
Waite v. American Creosote Works, Inc. 204 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1973
In Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc. 285 Minn. 32 , this court set out a five-point test for determining strict liability.
Haney v. International Harvester Company 201 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1972
Haney v. International Harvester Company 201 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1972
Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling Company 188 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1971
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Company 179 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1970
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Company 179 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1970
Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing, Inc. 285 Minn. 32 , 171 N. W. (2d) 201 ; Greco v. Bucciconi Engineering Co. (W. D. Pa.)

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by