Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Darrow, 177 N.W.2d 778.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The decision to allow or deny demonstrations or experiments performed during trial “rests in the sound discretion of the [district] court.” See State v. Darrow , d 778, 779 (Minn. 1970) (discussing experiments performed in court).
State of Minnesota v. Edwin Albert Dlugopolski Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Edwin Albert Dlugopolski Minn. Ct. App. 2016
287 Minn. 230, 234, (quotation omitted).
State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
See State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 235
State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 235 , State v. Ellingson, 283 Minn. 208, 211 , State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1, 36 , , certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Turnipseed 297 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1980
State v. Turnipseed 297 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1980
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 235 , State v. Ellingson, 283 Minn. 208, 211 , State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1, 36 , , certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Lindsey 284 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
State v. Lindsey 284 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 234
State v. Harvey 277 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1979
State v. Harvey 277 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1979
Even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230 , we cannot say that appellant’s belief that the killing was necessary to avert death or grievous bodily harm was unreasonable under the circumstances.
State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 235 , State v. Ellingson, 283 Minn. 208, 211 , State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1, 36 , , certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct.
Orwick v. Belshan 231 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1975
Orwick v. Belshan 231 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1975
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230 , State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 7A Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Hines 214 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1974
State v. Hines 214 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1974
Assuming, as we must, that the jury believed the state’s evidence on this disputed *539 issue, State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230 , we hold that the evideiice was sufficient to support the verdict.
State v. Coy 200 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1972
State v. Coy 200 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1972
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230 , State v. Schabert, 222 Minn. 261 , State v. Armstrong, 257 Minn. 295
State v. Evers 198 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1972
State v. Evers 198 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1972
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230
State v. Boyum 197 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1972
State v. Boyum 197 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1972
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230
State v. Thompson 196 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1972
State v. Thompson 196 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1972
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230
State v. Rak 193 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1971
State v. Rak 193 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1971
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230 , State v. O’Donnell, 280 Minn. 213
State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 234 , State v. De-Zeler, 230 Minn. 39, 49