Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 175 N.W.2d 148.

198 citing documents.

Marriage of Davey v. Davey 415 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426-427
Marriage of Hodges v. Hodges 415 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 440
Marriage of Driscoll v. Driscoll 414 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Driscoll v. Driscoll 414 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
[The trial court is permitted] to make such disposition of property acquired during coverture as “shall appear just and equitable, having regard to * * * all the facts and circumstances of the case.” Bollenback v. Bollenback, 285 Minn. 418, 426-7 , (citation omitted).
Taylor v. Taylor 413 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Taylor v. Taylor 413 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426 , Anderson v. Anderson, 260 Minn. 226, 230-31
Marriage of Volesky v. Volesky 412 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Volesky v. Volesky 412 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426
Marriage of Scholle v. Scholle 411 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Scholle v. Scholle 411 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426-27
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 428
Marriage of Melina v. Melina 411 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Melina v. Melina 411 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426-27
Marriage of Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 410 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 410 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In dissolution proceedings, parties are called upon to supply essential information in a proper way and “must make a full and accurate disclosure of their assets and liabilities.” Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 428
Marriage of Lunde v. Lunde 408 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lunde v. Lunde 408 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Appellant cites Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , and Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418 , in support of his argument that the award of maintenance is too high, claiming that the award will allow respondent to actually improve upon her former standard of living.
Marriage of Eichenholz v. Eichenholz 407 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Eichenholz v. Eichenholz 407 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollen-bach v. Bollenback, 285 Minn. 418, 426
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 407 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426-27
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 407 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426-27
Marriage of Salstrom v. Salstrom 404 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Salstrom v. Salstrom 404 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Bollenbach v. Bollenback, 285 Minn. 418 , 429 n. 5, , 156 n. 5 (1970).
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 440 , pet.
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Sieber, d at 757 (proper investment of proceeds from sale of $111,800 business “could certainly be a source of considerable future income”); Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 429-30, 437-38 , 160 (1970) (where husband’s net worth was approximately $3,000,000, wife’s net worth was approximately $250,000, and trust funds for children amounted to nearly $1,000,000, the trial court should determine “what amount will be necessary for the support of the children, in light o
Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn 402 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn 402 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 427
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 400 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 400 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426
Marriage of Varner v. Varner 400 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Varner v. Varner 400 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426
Marriage of Musielewicz v. Musielewicz 400 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 399 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 399 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 435
Maher v. Maher 393 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maher v. Maher 393 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rohling, d at 524 (citing *195 Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418 , ).
Marriage of Poach v. Poach 392 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Poach v. Poach 392 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bollenbach v. Bollenback, 285 Minn. 418, 426-7 , .
Marriage of Keithahn v. Keithahn 392 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Keithahn v. Keithahn 392 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426-27 , (footnote omitted).
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The trial court relied on Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418 , which states: A party to a marriage subject to severance in divorce proceedings cannot be permitted to subvert the orderly processes of the courts by concealing, dissipating, or misusing his assets in anticipation of divorce so as to reduce the property available for division or as a standard
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418 , the supreme court stated: This court, when called upon to review the exercise of trial court discretion in a case such as this, will and must affirm the decision of the trial court if it has an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though we might have reached a different disposition of
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986