Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 172 N.W.2d 292.

141 citing documents.

Miller v. City of Saint Paul 363 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Miller v. City of Saint Paul 363 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77
Schermerhorn v. Hoiland 337 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1983
Schermerhorn v. Hoiland 337 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1983
“It is clear that in reviewing the granting of motions [to dismiss] founded upon Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the model for our Rule 12.02, allegations in the complaint must be taken as true.” Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 82
Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
In Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , cert.
Kopperud v. Agers 312 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1981
Kopperud v. Agers 312 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1981
In our view, from a long-arm standpoint, this case is factually similar to Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , cert.
Elzie v. Commissioner of Public Safety 298 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1980
Elzie v. Commissioner of Public Safety 298 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1980
Since the court is required to accept as true the allegations in the complaint when ruling on a Rule 12.02 motion, Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , for purposes of disposition of this issue on appeal, we must assume the truth of appellants’ allegation that the Commissioner lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
Wendt Ex Rel. Geiser v. County of Osceola 289 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1979
Wendt Ex Rel. Geiser v. County of Osceola 289 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1979
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. Norris 270 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1978
Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. Norris 270 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1978
Lines v. Highway Trailer Indus., 291 Minn. 251 , Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied sub nom.
People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 266 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 266 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
6 .This conclusion is supported by another principle of statutory construction — that “ ‘a statute adopted from another state * * * is presumed to have been taken with the construction there placed upon it.’ ” Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 98 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Anderson v. Luitjens 247 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1976
Anderson v. Luitjens 247 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1976
In Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Savchuk v. Randal Rush 245 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
Savchuk v. Randal Rush 245 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
Co. v. Union Pacific R. Co. 297 Minn. 181 , Mid-Continent Freight Lines, Inc. v. Highway Trailer Industries, Inc. 291 Minn. 251 , Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis. 240 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1976
Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis. 240 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1976
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 109 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Kokesh v. City of Hopkins 238 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1976
Kokesh v. City of Hopkins 238 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1976
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314 233 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1975
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314 233 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1975
Jur., Statutes, § 476, quoted in Cooper v. Watson, 290 Minn. 362, 369 , and Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 97, note 19 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1010 , 90 S. Ct. 1239 , 25 L. ed. 2d 423 (1970).
Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. Shaffer 232 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1975
Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. Shaffer 232 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1975
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied, sub.
American Pollution Prevention Co. v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co. 230 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1975
American Pollution Prevention Co. v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co. 230 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1975
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied sub nom.
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Nelson 216 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1974
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Nelson 216 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1974
As we have before stated, “the most basic interest of our legislature in enacting § 543.19 was to afford maximum protection to this state’s residents injured by acts of nonresidents; that is, to extend the extra-territorial jurisdiction of our courts to the maximum limits consistent with constitutional limitations.” Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 96 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1010 , 90 S. Ct. 1239 , 25 L. ed. 2d 423 (1970); reiterated in Mid-Continent Freight Lines, *441 Inc. v. Hi
Franklin Manufacturing Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad 210 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1973
Franklin Manufacturing Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad 210 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1973
As we have recently stated in such cases as Mid-Continent Freight Lines v. Highway Trailer Industries, 291 Minn. 251 , and Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Ellwein v. Sun-Rise, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1972
Ellwein v. Sun-Rise, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1972
The test for jurisdiction is *111 whether the defendant has “certain minimum contacts with [the state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’ ” Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 109
Mid-Continent Freight Lines, Inc. v. Highway Trailer Industries, Inc. 190 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1971
Mid-Continent Freight Lines, Inc. v. Highway Trailer Industries, Inc. 190 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1971
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 96 , 172 N. W. (2d) 292, 304 , certiorari denied sub nom.
Cooper v. Watson 187 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1971
Wuertz v. Garvey 178 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1970
Wuertz v. Garvey 178 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1970
At this pretrial stage, as we recently held in Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 117 , 172 N. W. (2d) 292, 315 , the trial court “must give every credit to the facts well pleaded and the collateral evidence supporting it.” 2 Judge Earl Larson opined in United Barge Co. v. Logan Charter Serv.