Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Company, 173 N.W.2d 342.

32 citing documents.

Melony Michaels v. First USA Title, LLC, Triad Title & Abstract, LLC, National Union Fire Insurance Company of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Melony Michaels v. First USA Title, LLC, Triad Title & Abstract, LLC, National Union Fire Insurance Company of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., 285 Minn. 348, 350, d 342, 344 (1969) (notice of loss was a condition precedent).
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Cargill, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Co. 642 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cargill, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Co. 642 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354-55
North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 634 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 634 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354-55 , (stating that failure to furnish notice and proof of loss within policy deadlines does not invalidate insurance policy except "where giving such notice or proof is a condition precedent of liability under the insurance contract”).
Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 615 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2000
Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Ins. Ass'n 615 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2000
Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 615 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2000
Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348, 353-54 , see also Struble v. Occidental Life Ins.
Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Ins. Ass'n 615 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2000
Co., 285 Minn. 348, 353-54
Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 597 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 597 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354-55 , (noncompliance with condition precedent of proof of loss is “fatal to recovery” under theft-insurance policy); see also Shapiro v. Western Home Ins.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Urology Clinic, P.A. 537 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Urology Clinic, P.A. 537 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., 285 Minn. 348, 353 , (substantial compliance with requirements to provide notice of loss and proof of loss is sufficient); see also Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Ins./Continental Casualty, (requirement of immediate notice should be construed strictly against the insurer and lib
Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp. 450 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1990
Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp. 450 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1990
This court upholds notice provisions because the policy behind the requirement is to give the insurer “an opportunity for prompt investigation so as to protect itself against fraudulent or exorbitant claims and, while the matter is fresh in the minds of all, to appraise and determine a disposition by way of settlement or defense.” Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Clementson 431 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Clementson 431 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
13 (1901); Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348 , and Noon Realty
State v. Mimbach 420 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Mimbach 420 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See generally Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354 , (policy requirements of notice and proof of loss allow insurer opportunity to investigate claims).
McCullough v. Travelers Companies 415 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
McCullough v. Travelers Companies 415 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354-55
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
See Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354 , 8 J. Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice, § 4731 (1981).
Noon Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Noon Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Id.; see Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348
Terrell v. State Farm Insurance Co. 346 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1984
Terrell v. State Farm Insurance Co. 346 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1984
Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co., 285 Minn. 348, 354
Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance Companies 239 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1976
Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance Companies 239 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1976
This court noted in Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Co. 285 Minn. 348, 354 , : “* * * It is only reasonable to require that the insurer be given an opportunity for prompt investigation so as to protect itself against fraudulent claims and, while the matter is fresh in the minds of all, to appraise and determine a disposition by way of settlement or defense.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by