Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co., 171 N.W.2d 728.

32 citing documents.

Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., 285 Minn. 511, 513 , overruled on other grounds by Standslast v. Reid, 304 Minn. 358
Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc. 712 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc. 712 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., 285 Minn. 511, 513 , overruled on other grounds by Standslast v. Reid, 304 Minn. 358
State v. Murphy 545 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1996
State v. Murphy 545 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1996
Nelson's Office Supply Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner 508 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1993
Nelson's Office Supply Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner 508 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1993
See Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Prods., 285 Minn. 511, 515
City of St. Paul v. Spencer 497 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
City of St. Paul v. Spencer 497 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., 285 Minn. 511, 515 , rev’d on other grounds, Standslast v. Reid, 304 Minn. 358
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 433 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 433 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
However, “when an action is brought in a county in which ‘the cause of action or some part thereof arose,’ defendant cannot remove it to the county of his residence as a matter of right.” Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co., 285 Minn. 511, 513 , (citation omitted).
State v. Freeberg 390 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Freeberg 390 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co., 285 Minn. 511, 515
Associated Producers, Inc. v. Warren Grain & Seed Co. 241 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1976
Associated Producers, Inc. v. Warren Grain & Seed Co. 241 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1976
Opposing defendant’s demand for change of venue, plaintiff argues under Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511 , that the *151 contract was formulated by acceptance in Ramsey County, either when plaintiff by telephone accepted, defendant’s offer to sell the seed or when plaintiff mailed a confirmation letter.
Nyberg v. Wermerskirschen 233 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1975
Nyberg v. Wermerskirschen 233 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1975
Standslast v. Reid 231 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1975
Overruled Standslast v. Reid 231 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1975
To the extent that they conflict with or sanction a procedure foreign to the rule we derive from what we consider to be the proper line of authority on this point, cases such as Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511 , and Brudzinski v. DeKalb Agricultural Assn. Inc. 279 Minn. 486 , are overruled.
Johnson v. Minnesota Farm Bureau Marketing Corp. 232 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1975
Johnson v. Minnesota Farm Bureau Marketing Corp. 232 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1975
Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Lamberton v. Ebbesen, 300 *296 Minn. 517, Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511
FARMERS & MER. STATE BANK OF LAMBERTON v. Ebbesen 218 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1974
FARMERS & MER. STATE BANK OF LAMBERTON v. Ebbesen 218 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1974
In Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511 , we attempted to set down a framework for deciding these questions of venue.
Briggs Transportation Co. v. Ranzenberger 217 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1974
Briggs Transportation Co. v. Ranzenberger 217 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1974
In Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511, 513 , we interpreted this statutory language in the following manner: “In determining what would constitute ‘some part’ of a cause of action, it is clear, first of all, that the part must be something less than the whole.
Johnny's Plumb. & H., Inc. v. Sperry Rand C.-Univac D. 215 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1974
Johnny's Plumb. & H., Inc. v. Sperry Rand C.-Univac D. 215 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1974
*297 We have recently adopted guidelines for establishing venue in actions on contracts in Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511, 513
STATE EX REL. AMERICAN HOIST AND DERRICK, INC. v. Carew 198 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1972
STATE EX REL. AMERICAN HOIST AND DERRICK, INC. v. Carew 198 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1972
In Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511 , a venue case, this court discussed the question of what constitutes “some part” of a cause of action.
Arctic Enterprises, Inc. v. Plastics, Inc. 192 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1971
Arctic Enterprises, Inc. v. Plastics, Inc. 192 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1971
Finally, in Industrial Rubber Applicators, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co. 285 Minn. 511, 513 , we noted: “* * * We have interpreted the statutes [§§ 542.09, 542.10], read together, to mean that when an action is brought in a county in which ‘the cause of action or some part thereof arose,’ defendant cannot remove it to the county of his residence as a matter of right.” *20 .