Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Company, 179 N.W.2d 64.

55 citing documents.

Christina Ginther, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Components Co., Inc., (denying indemnity cross-claim for attorney fees where party seeking indemnity defended against its own “independent wrongful act” in a breach of express and implied warranty action); Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co. , -73 (Minn. 1970) (explaining district court may properly de ny indemnity for attorney fees when the party 13 seeking indemnity defends its own “separate wrongful acts” while also defending another’s conduct).
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 825 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2013
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 825 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2013
y liable for property damage “caused by acts or omissions of [Bol-duc].” Unlike direct liability, “vicarious liability is the ‘imposition of liability on one person for the actionable conduct of another, based solely on a relationship between the two persons.’ ” Sutherland, d at 5 (emphasis added) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1566 (6th ed.1990)); see also Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 96 , (explaining that vicarious lia bility is “predicated on or derived from” the wrongful act
Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. v. Belgrade Steel Tank Co. 823 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. v. Belgrade Steel Tank Co. 823 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 96-97 , -73 (1970).
In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 786 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 786 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 96-97
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co. 758 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Trigger's Supper Club v. Sunridge Farms, Inc. 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Shigellosis Litigation 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Trigger's Supper Club v. Sunridge Farms, Inc. 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 89 , (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965) (stating commercial seller who sells defective product is liable for physical harm even if seller is not negligent and not in privity with the injured person)).
In Re Shigellosis Litigation 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 89 , (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965) (stating commercial seller who sells defective product is liable for physical harm even if seller is not negligent and not in privity with the injured person)).
Marcon v. Kmart Corp. 573 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marcon v. Kmart Corp. 573 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 89 , see also Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., , 791 n. 4 (Minn.1977) (in strict habihty case, “retailer is liable to the consumer even absent culpability on its part”).
Wurst v. Friendshuh 517 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Wurst v. Friendshuh 517 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 97 , -73 (1970) (where party seeking indemnity must defend its own wrongful conduct as well as another’s, the court may properly disallow attorney fees in the indemnity action).
Hapka v. Paquin Farms 458 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1990
Hapka v. Paquin Farms 458 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1990
17 , 403 P.2d 145 (1965), see Farr v. Armstrong Rubber, 288 Minn. 83, 93-94 , -71 (1970), the Superwood court said, “[W]e hold that economic losses that arise out of commercial transactions, except those involving personal injury or damage to other property, are not recoverable under the tort theories of negligence or strict products liability.” d at 162 .
Kaess v. Armstrong Cork Co. 403 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1987
Kaess v. Armstrong Cork Co. 403 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1987
§ 176.061 (1984), and that manufacturers and distributors of unreasonably dangerous products may be sued for strict products hability, Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 90-91 , Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965).
Moe v. Springfield Milling Corp. 394 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Moe v. Springfield Milling Corp. 394 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 90-91
Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk 373 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1985
Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk 373 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1985
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 96
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 82, 90-91
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The judge based the denial of fees on Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83 , indicating that Gentile was defending a separate fraud claim.
Continental Insurance Co. v. Loctite Corp. 352 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Continental Insurance Co. v. Loctite Corp. 352 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 290 Minn. 321, 334-35 , Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 93
Rients v. International Harvester Co. 346 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rients v. International Harvester Co. 346 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bilotta v. Kelly Co., Inc., — N.W.2d — at n. 3 (Minn. March 16, 1984) (strict liability); Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc., (negligence); Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83 , (breach of warranty).
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1982
Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp. 311 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1981
Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp. 311 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1981
6 Although this is a case of first impression in Minnesota, this court has already demonstrated its approval of Seely in Farr v. *162 Armstrong Rubber, 288 Minn. 83
Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co. 304 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1981
Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co. 304 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1981
Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc., 306 Minn. 300, 306 , Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 97
Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota v. Dover Corp. 287 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1980
Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota v. Dover Corp. 287 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1980
See McCormack v. Hankscraft Co. Inc., 278 Minn. 822 , Magnuson v. Rupp Manufacturing Inc., 285 Minn. 32 , Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83
Amburgery v. Holan Division of Ohio Brass Co. 606 P.2d 21 Ariz. 1980
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Cf. McCormack v. Hankscraft Co. Inc., 278 Minn. 322, 338 , and Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
O'LAUGHLIN v. Minnesota Natural Gas Co. 253 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1977
O'LAUGHLIN v. Minnesota Natural Gas Co. 253 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1977
In regard to strict liability in tort under § 402 A, this court stated in Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83, 89 , : “ * * * Restatement, Torts (2d) § 402 A, * * * provides generally that a commercial seller who sells a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user is liable for physical harm to the user caused by the defective condition, even though the seller was not negligent
Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co. 246 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1976
Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co. 246 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1976
In Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co. 288 Minn. 83, 89 , we held in a suit by a driver against a tire manufacturer that it was not error for purposes of an instruction on strict liability to define a product as defective “if it fails to perform reasonably, adequately and safely the normal, anticipated or specified use to which the manufactu
Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1975
Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1975
The O’Connell case was cited by this court in the case of Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co. 288 Minn. 83 , in which several plaintiffs sued Armstrong Rubber Company and Elmer N. Olson Company for personal injuries resulting from the blowout of a tire.
Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc. 216 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1974