Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kempf v. Kempf, 177 N.W.2d 40.

34 citing documents.

C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago 742 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Edwards, 287 Minn. 83, 85
Welch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 545 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Welch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 545 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
349 n. 3 (Minn.1991) (order refusing to vacate appealable order is not appealable); Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529, 529-30 , (order denying motion for amended findings is not appealable).
Marriage of Bougie v. Bougie 494 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Bougie v. Bougie 494 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529, 530 , (order denying motion to amend a judgment is not appealable under Minn. R.Civ.App.P.
State v. Hershberger 462 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1990
See State v. Edwards, 287 Minn. 83, 86 , -43 (1970).
Marriage of Merrick v. Merrick 440 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Merrick v. Merrick 440 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
This court also dismissed the portion of the appeal from the order denying the motion for amended findings as not appealable under Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Preferred Financial Corp. v. Quality Homes, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Preferred Financial Corp. v. Quality Homes, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529 , Minn.R.Civ.App.P.
Geckler v. Samuelson 438 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Geckler v. Samuelson 438 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Marriage of Beeson v. Beeson 432 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Beeson v. Beeson 432 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio 431 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio 431 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Levine v. Hauser 431 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Levine v. Hauser 431 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529, 530
Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc. 418 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1988
Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc. 418 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1988
Financial Relations Bd., Inc. v. Pawnee Corp., 308 Minn. 109, 110 , Weinzierl v. Lien, 296 Minn. 539 , Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Marriage of Dinwiddie v. Dinwiddie 369 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Dinwiddie v. Dinwiddie 369 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Grant Company, 300 Minn. 223, 238 , Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Marriage of Angelos v. Angelos 367 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1985
Marriage of Angelos v. Angelos 367 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1985
Evenrud v. Park & Recreation Bd., 310 Minn. 234 , Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529 , Kottke’s Bus Co., Inc. v. Hippie, 286 Minn. 526
Marriage of Sumner v. Sumner 353 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Sumner v. Sumner 353 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kempf v. Kempf 287 Minn. 529
Costley v. Caromin House, Inc. 313 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1981
State v. Edwards, 287 Minn. 83
Evenrud v. PARK & REC. BD. OF CITY OF MPLS. 245 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1976
Evenrud v. PARK & REC. BD. OF CITY OF MPLS. 245 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1976
As respondent Board correctly points out in its brief, that order is nonappealable; cf. Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529 , Johnson v. Giese, 230 Minn. 185
Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of Brainerd 241 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
State v. Edwards, 287 Minn. 83, 87 , , 43 (1970).
Weinzierl v. Lien 209 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1973
Weinzierl v. Lien 209 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1973
Johnson v. Giese, 230 Minn. 185 , Shema v. Thorpe Bros. 238 Minn. 470 , Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Kempf v. Kempf 179 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1970
Kempf v. Kempf 179 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1970
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529 , 177 N. W. (2d) 40 .