DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Beltowski v. State, 183 N.W.2d 563.

64 citing documents.

  • Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
  • Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
    To warrant an evidentiary hearing, a postconviction petition must allege “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.”
  • Howard William Amos v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • Howard William Amos v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    To succeed in a postconviction petition, the petition must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” d 563, 564 (Minn. 1971).
  • Andrew Audstin Emerson Brown, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    See, (stating that the postconviction court properly denied relief on a post- sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea where defendant’s “claim of newly discovered evidence of entrapment amounted to no more on this record than a change of mind”); WL 3000010, at *3 (M
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    (“A defendant, no less than a prosecutor, should not be permitted to .
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “A defendant, no less than a prosecutor, should not be permitted to renege on a plea agreement without sufficient cause, nor to use a plea of guilty as a tactical device to frustrate the prosecution of an offense which the evidence would support.” Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 219, d 563, 566 (1971).
  • Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
  • Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
    Because a “petitioner’s allegations must [present] ‘more than argumentative assertions without factual support,’ ” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217, ), we decline to consider Fairbanks’s additional claims.
  • Rene Julian McKenzie v. State of Minnesota 872 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 2015
  • Rene Julian McKenzie v. State of Minnesota 872 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 2015
    (requiring appellant’s allegations to be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217, )).
  • Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
  • Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
    Similarly, in Hodgson v. State, we noted that a postconviction “petitioner’s allegations must be ‘more than argumentative assertions without factual support.’ ” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    See Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 219, (“A failure to require petitioner to adhere to a plea agreement properly negotiated and approved by the court would obviously have an adverse effect on the prosecution’s employment of plea negotiations and plea agreements as an effective aid in the administration of criminal justic
  • Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
  • Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
    First, the allegations in a petition must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • McKenzie v. State 754 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 2008
  • McKenzie v. State 754 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 2008
    “Allegations in a postconviction petition must be ‘more than argumentative assertions without factual support.’ ” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • Martin v. State 748 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2008
  • Martin v. State 748 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2008
    at 446 (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • Hathaway v. State 741 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2007
  • Hathaway v. State 741 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2007
    We will not consider allegations in a petition for postconviction relief that are “no more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • Powers v. State 731 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2007
  • Powers v. State 731 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2007
    The postconviction petition, however, must include “ ‘more than argumentative assertions without factual support.’ ” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
  • Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
    See Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
  • Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
    Further, allegations in a petition for postconviction relief must be “ ‘more than argumentative assertions without factual support.’ ” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
  • Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
    Allegations in a postconviction petition must be “ ‘more than argumentative assertions without factual support.’ ” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • A.C. Ford v. State 690 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2005
  • A.C. Ford v. State 690 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2005
    A petitioner’s allegations must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Hodgson, d at 517 (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • Zenanko v. State 688 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 2004
  • Zenanko v. State 688 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 2004
    In addition, a petitioner’s allegations must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Hodgson, d at 517 (citing Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).
  • Opsahl v. State 677 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
  • Sessions v. State 666 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 2003
  • Sessions v. State 666 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 2003
    See Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • King v. State 649 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2002
  • King v. State 649 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2002
    To warrant an evidentiary hearing a petitioner’s postconviction allegations must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” See Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
  • Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
    Allegations in a postconviction petition must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
  • Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
    Furthermore, a petitioner’s allegations in a postconviction petition must *371 be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
    A petitioner’s allegations in a postconviction petition must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • Gassler v. State 590 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1999
  • Gassler v. State 590 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1999
    Furthermore, a petitioner’s allegations must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217
  • Zenanko v. State 587 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1998
  • Zenanko v. State 587 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1998
    “The petitioner’s allegations must be ‘more than argumentative assertions without factual support.’ ” (quoting Beltowski v. State, 289 Minn. 215, 217 , ).