Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital Association, 177 N.W.2d 420.

28 citing documents.

In Re Conservatorship of Smith 655 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Conservatorship of Smith 655 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ass’n, 287 Minn. 187, 192
State v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 434 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 434 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
John’s Lutheran Hospital Association, 287 Minn. 187, 193 , the supreme court stated it was necessary that the trial court * * * enforce the rules designed to * * * keep dockets free of stale claims, the trial of which is fraught with unusual difficulties of proof and not infrequently produces unacceptable results to both the losing and
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
John’s Lutheran Hospital Association, 287 Minn. 187, 192
Belton v. City of Minneapolis 393 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Belton v. City of Minneapolis 393 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
John’s Lutheran Hospital Assn., 287 Minn. 187, 193 , (citation omitted).
Jadwin v. City of Dayton 379 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jadwin v. City of Dayton 379 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
John’s Lutheran Hospital Association, *197 287 Minn. 187 , Bio-Line, pet.
Marriage of Hoyland v. Kelly 379 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hoyland v. Kelly 379 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
John’s Lutheran Hospital Association, 287 Minn. 187 , (dismissal for failure to respond to discovery appropriate where there was an express warning by trial court of automatic dismissal for noncompliance).
Copeland v. Bragge 378 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Copeland v. Bragge 378 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
John’s Lutheran Hospital Association, 287 Minn. 187, 192-93
Marriage of Sudheimer v. Sudheimer 372 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Sudheimer v. Sudheimer 372 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
John’s Lutheran Hospital Association, 287 Minn. 187, 192
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul v. Kotlar 352 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul v. Kotlar 352 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Assoc., 287 Minn. 187 , however, the Minnesota Supreme Court found reasons sufficient to sustain a dismissal with prejudice.
Cotroneo v. Pilney 343 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1984
Cotroneo v. Pilney 343 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1984
John’s Lutheran Hospital Assn., 287 Minn. 187, 192-93
Peters v. Waters Instruments, Inc. 251 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1977
Peters v. Waters Instruments, Inc. 251 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1977
John’s Lutheran Hospital Assn. 287 Minn. 187
Breza v. Schmitz 248 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1976
Breza v. Schmitz 248 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1976
John’s Lutheran Hospital Assn. 287 Minn. 187
Zuleski v. Pipella 245 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1976
Zuleski v. Pipella 245 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1976
John’s Lutheran Hospital Assn. 287 Minn. 187
Electro Nuclear Systems Corp. v. Telex Corp. 205 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1973
Electro Nuclear Systems Corp. v. Telex Corp. 205 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1973
John’s Lutheran Hospital Assn. 287 Minn. 187 , 177 N.W.