DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Barness v. State, 187 N.W.2d 111.

30 citing documents.

  • Perry v. State 731 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2007
  • Perry v. State 731 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2007
    Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
    Rainer, d at 787 ; Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Scruggs v. State 484 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1992
  • Scruggs v. State 484 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1992
    See Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510 , (court reviews postconviction hearing to determine sufficiency of the evidence).
  • Fox v. State 474 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1991
  • Fox v. State 474 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1991
    Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
    “The scope of our review in a postconviction proceeding is limited to the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the postconviction court.” Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Marhoun v. State 451 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1990
  • Marhoun v. State 451 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1990
    Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Wedan v. State 409 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Wedan v. State 409 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Bamess v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Ramon v. Minnesota 399 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Ramon v. Minnesota 399 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Riley v. State 396 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Riley v. State 396 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    “The scope of our review in a postconviction proceeding is limited to the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the post-conviction court.” Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Danielski v. State 395 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Danielski v. State 395 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Our scope of review of a post-conviction proceeding is limited to “the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the post-conviction court.” Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Hanson v. State 345 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Hanson v. State 345 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509, 510
  • Kochevar v. State 281 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1979
  • Kochevar v. State 281 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1979
    Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509
  • State v. Kluck 217 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Kluck 217 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1974
    Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509 , State v. Keezer, 274 Minn. 292 , , certiorari denied, 385 U. S. 896 , 87 S. Ct. 216 , 17 L. ed. 2d 141 (1966); State v. Wilson, 238 Minn. 447 , State v. Duddy, 152 Minn. 179
  • State v. Wilson 200 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Wilson 200 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1972
    Knott v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 305 , Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509 , Annotation, 34 A. L. R. 3d 470.
  • State v. Graham 195 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Graham 195 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1972
    3 Barness v. State, 290 Minn. 509 , State v. Everson, 286 Minn. 246