Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 177 N.W.2d 790.

31 citing documents.

Ty Bernard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kelly Michels, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[T]he question of whether a motion for a new trial on the ground of excessive damages should be granted or whether the verdict should be reduced rests in the practical judgment and sound discretion of the [district] court.”
Nicholas Houchins, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[T]he question of whether a motion for a new trial on the ground of excessive damages should be granted or whether the verdict should be reduced rests in the practical 12 judgment and sound discretion of the [district] court.” d 790, 795 (Minn. 1970).
Aaron Larson v. BNSF Railway Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Aaron Larson v. BNSF Railway Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he question of whether a motion for a new trial on the ground of excessive damages should be granted or whether the verdict should be reduced rests in the practical judgment and sound discretion of the [district] court.” DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279, 286
Willis v. Indiana Harbor Steamship Co. 790 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Willis v. Indiana Harbor Steamship Co. 790 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“Ordinarily, the question of whether a motion for a new trial on the ground of excessive damages should be granted or whether the verdict should be reduced rests in the practical judgment and sound discretion of the trial court.” DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279, 286
Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279, 286
Oakland v. Stenlund 420 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Oakland v. Stenlund 420 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The question of negligence is normally a matter for the jury, DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279, 282 , however, the existence of a legal duty is an issue for the trial court to determine as a matter of law.
Hennen v. Huff 388 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hennen v. Huff 388 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc., (citing DeWitt v. Schubauer, 287 Minn. 279 , ).
Pomije v. Scheiber 371 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Pomije v. Scheiber 371 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279 , ).
Verhel Ex Rel. Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709 359 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1984
Verhel Ex Rel. Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709 359 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1984
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279, 286
DeRemer v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. 353 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
DeRemer v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. 353 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279
Hawkinson v. Geyer 352 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hawkinson v. Geyer 352 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279
Kinikin v. Heupel 305 N.W.2d 589 Minn. 1981
Kinikin v. Heupel 305 N.W.2d 589 Minn. 1981
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc. 257 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1977
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc. 257 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1977
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279
Moteberg v. Johnson 210 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1973
Moteberg v. Johnson 210 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1973
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279
Young Ex Rel. Young v. Hansen 209 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 1973
Young Ex Rel. Young v. Hansen 209 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 1973
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279
Stenzel v. Bach 203 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1973
Stenzel v. Bach 203 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1973
DeWitt v. Schuhbauer, 287 Minn. 279 , Fisher v. Edberg, 287 Minn. 105