Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Ford Motor Company, 184 N.W.2d 786.

32 citing documents.

Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper 428 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1988
Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper 428 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388, 394 , (citing Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 76 , , 28 A.L.R.2d 272, 279 (1950)).
Huling v. Stemm Transfer & Storage, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Huling v. Stemm Transfer & Storage, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388, 394
Christianson v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. 404 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Christianson v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. 404 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388, 394
Danielson Mobil, Inc. v. Johnson 394 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Danielson Mobil, Inc. v. Johnson 394 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388, 403
Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller 358 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller 358 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc., 296 Minn. 456, 459-60 , Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388, 403
Metropolitan Medical Center v. Richardville 354 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Metropolitan Medical Center v. Richardville 354 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388
Smith v. Employers' Overload Co. 314 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 1981
Smith v. Employers' Overload Co. 314 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 1981
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388
Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf 310 N.W.2d 80 Minn. 1981
Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. Uhlendorf 310 N.W.2d 80 Minn. 1981
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388 , , 63 A.L.R.3d 74 (1971); Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 267 Minn. 116
Hendrickson v. Northfield Cleaners 295 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1980
Hendrickson v. Northfield Cleaners 295 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1980
Nordling, supra; Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd. 261 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 1977
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd. 261 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 1977
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388, 403 , Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc., 296 Minn. 456
Lisa Marz v. Department of Employment Services 256 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1977
Lisa Marz v. Department of Employment Services 256 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1977
Most recently, in Ykovchick v. Public Schools of Minneapolis, Minn., this court stated: “* * * It is the rule in Minnesota that * * * the employer has the burden of proving the applicability of a disqualification provision (Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388 , [1971]; Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc., 286 Minn. 29 , [1970]).” Numerous other decisions are to the same effect.
Ykovchick v. Public Schools of Minneapolis 251 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1977
Ykovchick v. Public Schools of Minneapolis 251 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1977
It is the rule in Minnesota that while the employer has the burden of proving the applicability of a disqualification provision (Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. 289 Minn. 388 , [1971]; Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc. 286 Minn. 29 , [1970]), the claimant has the burden of proving eligibility under the unemployment compensation statutes.
Kleinwachter v. Department of Employment Services 234 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1975
Kleinwachter v. Department of Employment Services 234 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1975
268.09, Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. 289 Minn. 388 , Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc. 286 Minn. 29 , but the claimant should have the burden of proving eligibility.
Tripp v. Alley Construction Company, Inc. 210 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1973
Tripp v. Alley Construction Company, Inc. 210 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1973
1 The purposes and policy of the statute have been fully discussed in Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68 , Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 254 Minn. 93 , Johnson v. Wilson & Co. 266 Minn. 500 , Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 267 Minn. 116, 122 , Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. 289 Minn. 388, 393 , and Lehmann v. Western Airlines, Inc. 291 Minn. 6, 9
Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc. 209 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1973
Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc. 209 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1973
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. 289 Minn. 888 , Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc. 286 Minn. 29, 31 , Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 267 Minn. 116
Lehmann v. Western Airlines, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1971
Lehmann v. Western Airlines, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1971
F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 , 34 Minn. L. Rev. 271 ; Ayers v. Nichols, 244 Minn. 375 , 70 N. W. (2d) 296 ; Easthagen v. Naugle-Leck, Inc. 260 Minn. 198 , 109 N. W. (2d) 556 ; Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 267 Minn. 116 , 125 N. W. (2d) 444 ; Koll v. Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. 259 Minn. 287 , 107 N. W. (2d) 373 ; and the more recent case of Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. 289 Minn. 388 , 184 N. W. (2d) 786 .